Bill
S 1404
Strengthens federal tools to combat organized retail crime, creates a central coordination center, and broadens jurisdiction to target crossjurisdictional theft networks.
Note: the materials you provided include multiple, conflicting texts under the label “S 1404.” The header/title you gave (requiring open grand-jury proceedings for officer-involved shootings) does not appear in the supplied bill texts. The documents actually include (A) a federal bill titled “Combating Organized Retail Crime Act” (U.S. Senate S.1404, introduced 4/10/2025) and (B) a Massachusetts State Senate bill (Senate Docket No. 917 / S.1404) concerning MassHealth behavioral health access. Below I summarize both bills and flag the inconsistencies so you can tell me which one you want expanded.
Federal S.1404 — “Combating Organized Retail Crime Act” (introduced April 10, 2025)
- Purpose / Intent
- Strengthen federal tools to combat organized retail and supply‑chain theft, cargo theft, and resale/diversion of stolen goods through physical and online marketplaces. Directs federal coordination to address cross‑jurisdictional and transnational aspects of these crimes.
- Key findings cited in the bill
- Organized theft groups increasingly sophisticated and violent; retail larceny incidents rose 93% in 2023 vs. 2019 (National Retail Federation), with 90% rise in average dollar loss.
- Cargo theft rose 27% in 2024 (CargoNet) with an average value per theft over $202,000.
- More than 30 state laws since 2022 address organized theft; federal action needed to tackle interstate and international aspects.
- Major provisions (text is partially truncated)
- Amends Title 18, U.S. Code (criminal and forfeiture provisions). Specific amendments shown include changes to section 982(a)(5) (criminal forfeiture provisions) and insertion/extension of references to statutes such as 659 (interstate or foreign shipments by carrier) and 2314 (transportation of stolen goods), indicating broadened federal jurisdiction and forfeiture authority for theft/diversion tied to organized retail crime.
- Directs establishment of a central federal coordination center to align federal, state, local, territorial, and Tribal efforts to combat organized retail and supply‑chain crime.
- Seeks parity in federal investigative/prosecutorial tools to address organized theft similar to other supply‑chain theft prosecutions.
- Who’s affected
- Retailers, manufacturers, carriers, online marketplaces, consumers (through pricing/availability), state/local law enforcement, federal law enforcement and prosecutors, transnational crime networks.
- Potential impact
- Increased federal prosecutions, asset forfeiture, and interagency coordination; potential expansion of federal reach into thefts aggregated across incidents and jurisdictions; could improve disruption of resale networks but may raise questions about enforcement resources, evidentiary standards for aggregation, and impacts on civil forfeiture practice.
- Procedural status (from provided material)
- Read twice and referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee on 4/10/2025. (Text is truncated; additional procedural steps not fully documented.)
Massachusetts S.1404 / Senate Docket No. 917 — “An Act ensuring equitable access and care quality for MassHealth recipients”
- Purpose / Intent
- Improve equitable access to behavioral health services for MassHealth enrollees by increasing state oversight of managed‑care contracts and reimbursement practices.
- Key provisions
- Requires the Division (presumably MassHealth/Division of Medical Assistance) to certify that contracted accountable care organizations (ACOs), insurers, health plans, HMOs, behavioral health management firms, and third‑party administrators provide equal access to behavioral health services, benefits, and medications of comparable quality to MassHealth recipients.
- Requires the Division to obtain approval from the Secretary of the Executive Office of Health and Human Services for behavioral health policies, protocols, standards, contract specifications, utilization review/management criteria, and outcome measures used by contracted entities.
- Requires all contracted ACOs/insurers/etc. to submit their methodology for determining reimbursement levels to network inpatient mental health and substance use providers, including range and median payment amounts and how payments are updated. That information must be reported annually to the Division and specified legislative committees; an initial report must be submitted within 90 days of the act’s effective date.
- Who’s affected
- MassHealth recipients, managed‑care organizations, behavioral health providers (including inpatient), state executive agencies, and relevant legislative committees.
- Potential impact
- Greater transparency and state oversight of behavioral health reimbursement and utilization policies; may improve provider payment adequacy and access but could have budgetary implications for managed‑care contracts and state oversight capacity.
- Procedural status (from the provided docket)
- Filed 1/15/2025; referred to the Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery. (Some legislative actions listed in your materials appear duplicated or inconsistent.)
Conflicts and next steps
- The initial title you provided (public grand‑jury hearings for officer-involved shootings) is not present in any of the supplied texts. The federal and Massachusetts bills above are substantively different.
- Please confirm which bill you want a focused, single‑document summary on (the federal Combating Organized Retail Crime Act, the Massachusetts MassHealth behavioral health bill, or the entirely different bill about grand‑jury proceedings). If you have the correct bill text for the grand‑jury proposal or a bill number tied to that content, share it and I will produce a detailed summary.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
