WeVote
Log In

Bill

RB

Bill

A 4013

Requires Social Media Research Center to research and make recommendations concerning addictive social media behaviors.*

2026-2027 Regular Session Introduced by Rosy Bagolie and 7 co-sponsors

New Jersey bill requires major social media platforms to implement mental health protections including usage limits, non-algorithmic feed options, and restrictions on targeted advertising.

Substituted by S3412 (SCS/1R)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 4013

Legislative bill overview

Bill A 4013 requires social media platforms to implement specific measures designed to protect user mental health, including features like usage warnings, the ability to disable algorithmic feeds, and restrictions on certain targeted advertising practices. The bill applies to platforms with significant user bases and requires them to make mental health protections a standard part of their service design rather than optional features buried in settings.

Why is this important

Social media's impact on mental health—particularly among young people—has become a significant public concern, with research linking heavy use and algorithmic engagement to increased anxiety, depression, and self-harm. This bill represents an attempt to shift responsibility toward platforms themselves rather than relying solely on individual user choices, potentially setting a precedent for state-level regulation of tech company practices.

Potential points of contention

  • Implementation costs and feasibility: Platforms may argue that redesigning algorithms and user interfaces to comply would be technically complex and expensive, potentially affecting smaller competitors more severely than established giants
  • Free speech and content curation concerns: Critics may contend that restricting algorithmic feeds or targeted advertising raises questions about platform editorial discretion and whether regulation infringes on protected speech
  • Definitional ambiguity: The bill's specific requirements around "certain actions" and what constitutes adequate mental health protections may be vague, creating enforcement challenges and litigation over compliance standards

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.