Requires certain public schools in N.Y. city to offer Halal food options during lunch
Creates a Special Waterfront Development Oversight Commission to allow alternative DPA compliance for projects, still needing General Court approval.
Creates a Special Waterfront Development Oversight Commission to allow alternative DPA compliance for projects, still needing General Court approval.
S. 667 proposes an alternative pathway for compliance with designations and regulations governing Designated Port Authorities (DPAs) in Massachusetts. The bill would create a new Special Waterfront Development Oversight Commission to develop criteria and approve development proposals in Designated Port Areas that do not meet the strict requirements of current law. Projects approved under this process would still require formal review and approval by the General Court (the Legislature) before commencement.
1) Section 5A (new in Chapter 21A)
- “Notwithstanding” other laws, the secretary or an appointee, in conjunction with the Special Waterfront Development Oversight Commission, may comment on and approve proposals for development in DPAs that do not meet strict compliance with Chapter 21A or 91.
- This creates an official mechanism to consider alternative compliance proposals.
2) Special Waterfront Development Oversight Commission (new establishment)
- Composed of 7 members with appointments from multiple branches/officials:
- 1 member appointed by the Governor (to serve as Chair)
- 1 appointed by the Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs
- 1 appointed by the Senate President (2-year term)
- 1 appointed by the Speaker of the House (2-year term)
- 1 appointed by the Senate Minority Leader (2-year term)
- 1 appointed by the House Minority Leader (2-year term)
- Members must be experts in environmental policy, public policy, municipal administration, or economic development.
- The Commission develops criteria for applicants seeking alternative compliance with DPA laws and regulations.
- Any project approved by the Commission must be submitted to the clerks of the House and Senate and to the chairs of ranking members of the Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government.
- The project may not commence without approval from the General Court.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.