WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 2227

Requires all state departments to report the cost of complying with federal regulations to the department of economic development

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Louis Riggs

Missouri state departments would be required to report the costs of complying with federal regulations to the Department of Economic Development.

Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
#economicdevelopment #departmentof #federal-staterelations #statedepartments
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2227

Bill overview

HB 2227 (2026) from the state of Missouri would require all state departments to report the cost of complying with federal regulations to the Department of Economic Development (DED).

  • Jurisdiction: Missouri
  • Session: 2026
  • Title: Requires all state departments to report the cost of complying with federal regulations to the department of economic development
  • Sponsor: Primary sponsor not listed; co-sponsor: Louis Riggs
  • Action history:
    • Prefiled: 2025-12-05
    • Read First Time: 2026-01-07
    • Read Second Time: 2026-01-08
    • Referred: Emerging Issues (H) on 2026-05-15

Purpose and intent

  • The bill aims to quantify the administrative and economic burden that federal regulatory compliance imposes on Missouri state agencies.
  • By centralizing cost reporting through the Department of Economic Development, the measure seeks to create a consolidated picture of compliance costs across all departments.
  • The underlying objective appears to be informing state policy discussions, budgeting, and potential regulatory reform or advocacy at the state level based on the reported costs.

Key provisions

  • Mandatory reporting: All state departments must report the annual or periodic costs associated with complying with federal regulations to the Department of Economic Development.
  • Departmental coordination: The DED would presumably receive, compile, and possibly publish or use these cost reports to inform policy and budgetary decisions.
  • Scope of costs: The bill would likely define what constitutes “cost of complying” (e.g., staff time, administrative overhead, systems and technology investments, training, external consulting, and any other direct or indirect compliance expenses). The exact definitions are not provided in the summary but would be set out in the bill's text.
  • Reporting cadence: The bill would specify how often costs must be reported (annually, quarterly, etc.) and by which entities within each department.
  • Data usage: While not explicit in the summary, such bills typically authorize the DED to analyze, publish, or share aggregated cost data with the legislature, other state agencies, or the public, subject to privacy and security considerations.

Who is affected

  • Primary affected entities: All state departments and agencies in Missouri that are subject to federal regulatory compliance requirements.
  • Administrative burden: Agencies would need to allocate staff time and resources to collect and report cost data.
  • Economic development implications: The DED would gain visibility into the cost burden of federal regulations, which could influence policy recommendations, budget requests, or grant/initiative programs designed to alleviate regulatory costs.

Procedural and timeline considerations

  • Prefile and introduction: The bill was prefiled in December 2025 and introduced in January 2026.
  • Committee action: Referred to Emerging Issues (H) on May 15, 2026, indicating initial committee oversight and potential hearings to discuss broader implications.
  • Potential next steps: If advanced, the bill would undergo committee review, potential amendments, and floor consideration in the House, followed by potential Senate action and governor’s signature (not indicated in the provided history).

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Transparency and accountability: The reporting requirement could improve transparency around regulatory costs and help quantify the burden of federal rules on state operations.
  • Budget and policy leverage: With consolidated data, the state could pursue targeted reforms, exemptions, waivers, or state-level alternatives to reduce compliance costs or advocate for federal reform.
  • Administrative load: Agencies may face new administrative tasks to collect and categorize costs, which could require additional resources or guidance from the DED.
  • Data privacy and scope: The bill would need clear definitions to avoid ambiguity in what costs are included and ensure sensitive information is protected.

Summary

HB 2227 would compel Missouri’s state departments to systematically report the costs associated with complying with federal regulations to the Department of Economic Development. The intent is to illuminate the financial impact of federal rules on state governance, enabling informed budgeting and potential policy action. The measure moves through the legislative process with a referral to the Emerging Issues committee, following early readings and prefiling earlier in the 2026 session.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.