WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 1885

Requires a valid government issued photo identification card to be presented when casting a ballot

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Mark Walczyk

Requires public works projects to have awarding authorities maintain police-detail records, receive invoices, and pay providers directly; police-detail costs must not be in bids.

REFERRED TO ELECTIONS
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 1885

Summary — S.1885 (2025): "An Act relative to the timely and consistent payment of law enforcement personnel"

Note: the bill text provided addresses payment for police details on public works projects in Massachusetts. Some metadata in the record (title about voter ID, listed sponsors, and certain dates/status entries) conflict with the bill text. Where conflicts exist this summary follows the bill text (the statutory amendment) and flags inconsistent metadata at the end.

Purpose

To ensure timely and consistent payment to law enforcement personnel who provide paid police details on public works projects by making the project awarding authority directly responsible for recordkeeping and payment, and by removing police-detail costs from contractor bid submissions.

Key provisions

  • Amends Section 39M of Chapter 30 of the Massachusetts General Laws by adding paragraph (f).
  • Paragraph (f) requires that, for public works projects under Chapter 30:
    • The project awarding authority (e.g., the public agency awarding the contract) shall:
    • Maintain police detail records,
    • Receive invoices from entities providing paid police details, and
    • Make direct payments to those entities providing paid police details.
    • The cost of police details shall not be included as part of the bid submitted by any offerer responding to the bid solicitation.
    • This paragraph (f) must be referenced or included as part of the bid documents for public works projects.

Who would be affected

  • Project awarding authorities (state agencies, municipalities, or other public entities that award public works contracts under Chapter 30) — they would assume direct administration and payment responsibilities for police details.
  • Law enforcement agencies and other entities that provide paid police details — they would invoice and receive payment directly from the awarding authority rather than through a contractor.
  • Contractors and offerers bidding on public works projects — bids would no longer include police-detail costs; contractors would not be responsible for paying or administering those details as part of their bid pricing.
  • Potentially taxpayers and public budgets — awarding authorities would directly bear the payment obligations and must budget accordingly.

Potential impacts

  • Administrative: awarding authorities will need processes to track police detail assignments, receive invoices, and make payments; may require staff time or systems changes.
  • Financial: shifts payment flow from contractors to awarding authorities. This could reduce contractors’ administrative burden and cash-flow risk but may increase direct expenditures and budgetary responsibilities for public entities.
  • Equity/timeliness: intended to improve timely and consistent payments to law enforcement/detail providers by removing intermediary billing through contractors.
  • Procurement: alters bid document requirements and may change how bids are priced and evaluated.

Procedural status and timeline (record notes and conflicts)

  • Bill text filed as “SENATE DOCKET NO. 121” and Senate Bill No. 1885 (filed 01/08/2025).
  • Legislative action entries include readings, committee referrals, and hearings (dates in 2025), and an entry listing the bill as “DEFEATED IN ELECTIONS” on 05/06/2025.
  • There are two clear data conflicts in the provided record:
    • The bill title at the top (requiring government photo ID to cast a ballot) does not match the bill text (police-detail payment).
    • Sponsors listed (e.g., Katie Britt, Jon Husted, Elissa Slotkin) are federal-level legislators and do not match the Massachusetts Senate filing name (Michael O. Moore) shown in the bill text.
  • Recommendation: consult the official Massachusetts legislature website or the bill file for authoritative current status, sponsor list, and correct title because the provided metadata appears inconsistent with the bill text.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.