WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 4

REQUESTING THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS TO PASS LEGISLATION TO AMEND THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 TO PROHIBIT DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, AND GENDER IDENTITY IN EMPLOYMENT, HOUSING, PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS, EDUCATION, FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAMS, CREDIT, AND JURY SERVICE.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Terez Amato and 6 co-sponsors

Hawaii urges Congress to expand federal civil rights law to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing, education, and public services.

Offered
#federalequalityact #sex #andgenderidentity #sexualorientation
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 4

Legislative bill overview

This is a Hawaii state resolution requesting that the U.S. Congress amend the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity across employment, housing, public accommodations, education, federally funded programs, credit, and jury service. The resolution does not itself create law but rather urges federal legislative action.

Why is this important

Currently, federal civil rights protections do not explicitly cover sexual orientation and gender identity in most contexts, leaving LGBTQ+ individuals vulnerable to legal discrimination in many states. Passing such federal legislation would create uniform protections across all states and establish clear legal standards, though it would also represent a significant expansion of federal civil rights authority and anti-discrimination law.

Potential points of contention

  • Religious exemption scope: Disputes over how broadly religious organizations and individuals can claim exemptions from anti-discrimination requirements
  • Sex vs. gender identity distinction: Debate over whether existing sex-discrimination protections adequately cover gender identity or if explicit enumeration creates different legal standards
  • Federalism concerns: Questions about federal versus state authority to regulate employment, housing, and other traditionally state-regulated areas
  • Business compliance costs: Concerns about implementation expenses for small businesses and other entities adapting to new legal requirements
  • Competing rights: Tension between anti-discrimination protections and claims about religious liberty and free speech

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.