WeVote

Bill

Bill

SR 179

REQUESTING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND CONGRESS TO SUPPLY UKRAINE WITH THE WEAPONS NEEDED TO FULLY DEFEND ITSELF AGAINST RUSSIAN ATTACKS AND RETAKE ITS TERRITORY AS RECOGNIZED BY INTERNATIONAL LAW.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Lorraine Inouye and 2 co-sponsors

Hawaii urges federal government to provide Ukraine comprehensive weapons and military support for defense and territorial reclamation under international law.

The committee(s) on EIG recommend(s) that the measure be PASSED, UNAMENDED. The votes in EIG were as follows: 4 Aye(s): Senator(s) Wakai, Chang, Richards, Fevella; Aye(s) with reservations: none ; 0 No(es): none; and 1 Excused: Senator(s) DeCoite.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SR 179

Legislative bill overview

SR 179 is a non-binding resolution from the Hawaii State Senate requesting that the U.S. President and Congress provide Ukraine with comprehensive military weapons and support to defend itself against Russian aggression and reclaim territory under international law. As a state-level resolution, it carries no legal force but serves as an expression of the state legislature's position on federal foreign policy.

Why is this important

This resolution reflects how the Ukraine-Russia conflict has become a matter of political concern even at the state level, potentially signaling constituent sentiment in Hawaii. It demonstrates the ongoing debate about the extent and nature of U.S. military aid to Ukraine, which involves substantial federal spending and questions about long-term American strategic involvement.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope of military aid: What specific weapons systems constitute "needed to fully defend" is contested—some argue current aid levels are sufficient while others believe advanced systems are essential for Ukrainian victory
  • Escalation risks: Critics worry that unconditional weapons provision and support for territorial reclamation could increase nuclear-armed Russia confrontation risks, while supporters argue deterrence requires credible capability
  • Federal vs. state authority: Questions about whether state legislatures should formally weigh in on federal foreign policy decisions and military aid priorities

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.