WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

H 5401

REPORT of the SPECIAL JOINT COMMITTEE on INITIATIVE PETITIONS on the INITIATIVE PETITION of ANDREW B. MIKULA AND OTHERS FOR THE PASSAGE OF AN ACT TO ALLOW SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON SMALL LOTS IN AREAS WITH ADEQUATE INFRASTRUCTURE (see House, No. 5000).

194th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Alice Peisch

Would permit single-family homes on 5,000 sq ft lots in areas deemed to have adequate infrastructure, overriding local zoning, if approved by voters.

See H5000
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 5401

Summary of House 5401 (H 5401), 194th Massachusetts Legislature

Initiative Petition: “Law to Allow Single-Family Homes on Small Lots in Areas with Adequate Infrastructure” (House 5000)

1) Purpose and intent

  • The petition seeks to authorize, as a matter of right, the development of single-family homes on 5,000-square-foot lots in areas that are deemed to have adequate infrastructure, overriding existing local zoning requirements.
  • Stated objective: to increase housing production of small homes, expand the supply of buildable land, and improve housing affordability across the Commonwealth.

2) Key provisions and changes proposed

  • Authorization: The initiative would permit single-family home construction on 5,000 sq ft lots notwithstanding local zoning rules.
  • Infrastructure standard: The measure relies on a determination of “adequate infrastructure” in the affected area, though the petition does not appear to provide explicit, objective criteria within the text summarized here.
  • Mechanism: As an initiative petition, it would be a ballot measure approved or rejected by voters. If approved, it would become law as written; the Legislature would not be able to modify the proposition.
  • Certification: The Secretary of the Commonwealth (via the Attorney General’s initial certification under Article 48) would determine whether the petition meets the constitutional criteria for initiation. The committee notes that certification does not assess broader constitutionality.

3) Who would be affected

  • Housing development: Potential developers, homebuyers, and prospective residents seeking small, single-family homes on small lots.
  • Local jurisdictions: Municipalities would face changes to zoning applicability and development standards in areas deemed to have adequate infrastructure.
  • State and local planning: Requires consideration of infrastructure adequacy, potential impacts on land use planning, school enrollment, traffic, utilities, and neighborhood character.
  • General public: Voters would ultimately decide by ballot whether to adopt the measure.

4) Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Process under Article 48: Voters can propose laws or constitutional amendments via initiative petition. After signature certification, the petition is presented to the Legislature and referred to a special committee.
  • Committee review: The Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions held hearings in March 2026 and issued a report on May 4, 2026.
  • Legislature action: Unlike typical bills, the Legislature may only approve or reject an initiative petition as submitted; no amendments are allowed to the ballot language.
  • Committee outcome: A majority of the committee recommended that the General Court take no action on the petition.
  • Certification note: The Attorney General initially certified the petition under Article 48; however, Article 48 does not evaluate broader constitutionality. The committee emphasizes that certification is not a judgment on constitutionality.

5) Committee and legislative recommendation

  • Position: The Special Joint Committee (by a majority) recommends that the General Court take no action on the petition.
  • Rationale: Based on a comprehensive review of the language, potential legal, administrative, and fiscal implications, and concerns raised in testimony about ambiguity (e.g., what constitutes “adequate infrastructure” and the size/character of allowable structures). The committee recognizes housing needs but concludes the petition cannot be supported in its current form, and the legislature cannot amend ballot language for this petition.

6) Additional notes

  • Sponsorship: House 5401 records the Special Joint Committee’s report on the initiative petition presented by Andrew B. Mikula (and others), with a co-sponsor noted as Alice Peisch.
  • Public record: The hearing and supporting documentation are publicly accessible (e.g., malegislature.gov) for those seeking the full testimony and data considered by the committee.

Bottom-line

The petition seeks to allow 5,000-square-foot-lot, single-family housing in areas with deemed adequate infrastructure, potentially bypassing standard local zoning. The committee, after review and public input, recommends that the General Court take no action on the petition, while noting that certification under Article 48 does not assess overall constitutionality.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.