WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 452

Remedies and Special Proceedings - As introduced, requires that the trial for an unlawful detainer action be held no later than 14 days from the date the plaintiff filed the unlawful detainer motion; limits the scope of a hearing for an unlawful detainer motion based on nonpayment of rent to facts and issues related to nonpayment of rent; makes other changes related to judicial proceedings for unlawful detainer. - Amends TCA Title 29 and Title 66.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Ronnie Glynn

NC HB 452 strengthens penalties for obstructing health facilities, and adds an 8-foot approaching rule within 100 feet of facility entrances for protests or distribution.

Taken off notice for cal in s/c Civil Justice Subcommittee of Judiciary Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 452

HB 452 — Revise Law / Obstruction of Health Facility (North Carolina)

Status: Passed 1st Reading (filed 11/12/2024); effective date provided in bill: December 1, 2025 (applies to offenses committed on or after that date).

Sponsors: Rep. Greenfield (primary); additional sponsors listed in versions include Representatives K. Brown, Johnson‑Hostler, and Cunningham.

Summary
This bill revises North Carolina’s criminal statute on obstruction of health care facilities (G.S. 14‑277.4). It clarifies and expands the conduct that is prohibited near health care facilities, establishes a new buffer/approach rule for certain communications near facility entrances, and sets a three‑tier penalty structure that increases punishments for repeat offenders.

Key provisions and changes
- Core prohibition (subsection a): Retains/clarifies that no person may obstruct or block access to or egress from a health care facility (or common areas of the property where it sits) in a way that delays or deprives someone of obtaining or providing health care services.

  • Assault/threat (subsection b): Prohibits injuring or threatening to injure persons who are obtaining, lawfully aiding, or providing health care services.

  • New approach/communication rule (subsection b1): Creates a criminal prohibition on knowingly approaching another person within 8 feet (without consent) for the purpose of:

    • Passing leaflets/handbills,
    • Displaying a sign to, or
    • Engaging in oral protest, education, or counseling with a person in the public way or sidewalk area within a 100‑foot radius of any entrance door to a health care facility.
  • Penalties (subsection c):

    • First violation of subsections (a) or (b): Class 2 misdemeanor.
    • Second conviction within 3 years: Class 1 misdemeanor.
    • Third (or subsequent) conviction within 3 years: Class I felony. (The statute as revised treats repeat offenses within a three‑year window as escalating criminal offenses.)

Who and what would be affected
- Directly affected: Individuals who block clinic/hospital entrances, threaten or assault patients/staff, and persons who approach others for distributing literature or engaging them in protest/“counseling” within the specified 100‑foot zone (unless the person consents).
- Indirectly affected: Patients, clinic staff, volunteers/escorts, protestors/advocates, law enforcement agencies responsible for enforcing the statute, and health care facility administrators (signage, training, and security practices may need updating).

Procedural / timeline aspects
- Effective date: The bill specifies it becomes effective December 1, 2025, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date.
- Legislative status (as provided): Filed 11/12/2024; read first time March 18–20, 2025; referred to Rules/Calendar; currently shown as passed 1st reading.

Potential implementation considerations
- Enforcement: Law enforcement and prosecutors will need guidance on applying the 8‑foot/100‑foot rule and on establishing consent and intent elements for communications.
- Facility operations: Clinics and hospitals may adopt or revise signage and protocols to inform the public of the buffer rule and to coordinate with local police on enforcement.
- Legal considerations: Changes narrow some protester conduct near facilities; potential constitutional issues (e.g., free speech) could be litigated, depending on enforcement and how courts interpret the statute’s scope and definitions.

For full text and exact statutory language, consult the bill as introduced and the revised G.S. 14‑277.4 in the North Carolina General Assembly records.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.