WeVote

Bill

Bill

SR 101

Relative to the election of members of the Senate Committee on Rules.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Angelique Ashby

SR 101 proposes establishing preferred procedures for how members of the California Senate Committee on Rules are elected or appointed.

Read. Adopted. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4112.)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SR 101

Summary of SR 101 (2025-2026, California)

Purpose and intent

  • SR 101 is a Senate Resolution proposed in the California Senate with the aim of addressing the election of members of the Senate Committee on Rules. The resolution signals a procedural or organizational change related to how the Rules Committee members are selected or elected within the Senate.
  • The bill is a nonbinding resolution, meaning it expresses the Legislature’s stance or recommendations rather than creating new laws or altering statutory provisions.

Key provisions and changes

  • Specific text not provided in the summary, but as a Senate Resolution, SR 101 likely:
    • Addresses the method by which members are chosen to serve on the Senate Committee on Rules.
    • Could propose criteria, timelines, or a process for nomination and/or election of Rules Committee members.
    • May outline duties or expectations for the Committee on Rules or for its members.
  • The bill’s title indicates a focus on “Relative to the election of members of the Senate Committee on Rules,” suggesting the resolution may recommend or establish preferred procedures for how the committee is staffed.

Who or what would be affected

  • Members of the California Senate, specifically those who would serve on the Senate Committee on Rules.
  • The Senate’s internal governance and procedural operations, including how vacancies are filled and how nominations or elections are conducted for the Rules Committee.
  • Potential impact on the workflow of Senate leadership and the handling of rules-related matters, such as legislation labeling, amendments, and calendar management, depending on the role of the Rules Committee.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • History of actions:
    • Introduced and referred to the Committee on Rules (RLS) on 2026-04-20.
    • From committee, ordered to third reading on 2026-04-22.
    • Read and adopted on 2026-04-30 with a vote of 36 ayes, 0 nays.
  • The resolution has passed through committee stages and reached a final reading and adoption phase within April 2026, indicating movement toward a formal vote or ratification by the full Senate (subject to the subsequent steps in the legislative process).

Additional notes

  • Co-sponsor: Angelique Ashby, indicating support or backing from at least one Senate member.
  • As a resolution, SR 101 does not create new statutory requirements but may guide or formalize preferred practices for electing or selecting Rules Committee members.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to emphasize potential policy implications for legislative process, or compare SR 101 to prior rules-related resolutions or committee appointment practices.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.