WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 115

Relating to the use by a political subdivision of public funds for lobbying activities.

89th Legislature, 2nd Called Session (2025) Introduced by Daniel Alders and 55 co-sponsors

HB 115 restricts Texas political subdivisions from using public funds to lobby the state legislature, limiting how cities and counties can advocate for local interests.

Referred to State Affairs
#attorney'sfees(s0202) #charitable&nonprofitorganizations(i0055) #countygovernment--employees/officers(i0095) #countygovernment--finance(i0097) #ethics(i0345) #lobbyists&lobbying(s3141) #legislature(i0520) #politicalsubdivisions(i0588)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 115

Legislative bill overview

HB 115 restricts how Texas political subdivisions (cities, counties, school districts, etc.) can spend public funds on lobbying activities. The bill likely establishes new limitations, disclosure requirements, or prohibitions on using taxpayer money to hire lobbyists or conduct legislative advocacy efforts. The exact provisions require reviewing the bill text, but such measures typically aim to prevent local governments from using public resources to influence state legislation.

Why is this important

Taxpayers have legitimate concerns about whether their local tax dollars should fund efforts to lobby the state legislature, especially when those lobbying positions may conflict with constituent interests. This bill addresses the tension between local government autonomy and public accountability over fund usage. The outcome could significantly affect how local governments advocate for their interests at the state level.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope of restrictions: Defining what counts as "lobbying" versus legitimate government communication and advocacy could be contentious—does it include city managers testifying, submitting written comments, or only paid lobbyists?
  • Local government impact: Restrictions could disadvantage smaller political subdivisions that lack resources to effectively advocate without hired lobbyists, potentially giving advantage to larger, wealthier entities
  • Federalism concerns: Local officials may argue this infringes on their ability to represent constituent interests before the state legislature where decisions directly affecting their communities are made

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.