WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 713

Relating to the surcharge for the disposal, and the remittance for the storage, of certain waste at the Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Compact waste disposal facility; decreasing the amount of the surcharge and changing how the surcharge and remittance are distributed.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Kevin Sparks

SB 713 reduces radioactive waste disposal surcharges and restructures revenue distribution for Texas's low-level waste facility, affecting funding and state-to-operator cost allocation.

Referred to Natural Resources
#environmentalquality #texascommissionon(v0334) #environment--hazardous #toxic&nuclearwaste(i0333) #fees&othernontaxrevenue--state(i0362) #taxation--general(i0815)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 713

Legislative bill overview

SB 713 modifies Texas's financial structure for managing low-level radioactive waste by decreasing the surcharge imposed on waste disposal and altering how surcharge revenues and storage remittances are distributed among relevant parties. The bill specifically addresses operations at the Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Compact facility, which serves as a regional repository for radioactive waste from multiple states.

Why is this important

Low-level radioactive waste management directly affects public health, environmental safety, and operational costs for hospitals, research institutions, and nuclear facilities across Texas and participating compact states. Changes to surcharge amounts and revenue distribution influence facility funding levels, waste management practices, and potentially the rates charged to generators of radioactive waste—ultimately affecting healthcare costs and research expenses.

Potential points of contention

  • Revenue reduction impact: Decreasing the surcharge may reduce funding available for facility maintenance, safety improvements, and long-term waste storage oversight, raising questions about whether operations remain adequately financed
  • Distribution fairness: Changing how revenues are distributed could shift financial burdens between the state, the facility operator, and other compact members, potentially disadvantaging some stakeholders
  • Interstate compact implications: Modifications affecting a multi-state compact facility require careful coordination; changes may conflict with compact agreements or disadvantage non-Texas members relying on the facility

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.