WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 106

Relating to the separation of federal elections from state and local elections, and to related practices and procedures.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Bob Hall

SB 106 would separate Texas federal elections from state/local elections on different dates, altering voter turnout patterns and increasing election administration costs.

Referred to State Affairs
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 106

Legislative bill overview

SB 106 proposes to separate federal elections (presidential, congressional) from state and local elections in Texas, requiring them to be held on different dates. The bill would also modify related voting procedures and practices to accommodate this separation of electoral cycles.

Why is this important

Election timing affects voter turnout, campaign costs, and which candidates benefit from being on the same ballot. Separating federal from state/local elections could significantly alter voting patterns and candidate viability, as voters typically turn out at different rates depending on what offices are at stake. This would represent a substantial shift in how Texans conduct elections.

Potential points of contention

  • Voter turnout impact: Holding separate elections typically reduces turnout for the lower-profile election, potentially affecting representation and mandates for state/local officials
  • Election costs: Running two separate election cycles doubles administrative and operational expenses for counties and the state
  • Partisan effects: Different election dates may benefit different parties depending on which election cycle sees higher turnout in particular demographics or regions
  • Implementation complexity: Coordinating separate federal vs. state/local election calendars creates logistical challenges for election administration, voter registration, and campaign organization

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.