WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 3673

Relating to the revocation of an occupational license from certain license holders and the issuance of a provisional occupational license to certain applicants with criminal convictions.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Daniel Alders and 139 co-sponsors

Texas bill allowing occupational license revocation for some holders while creating provisional licenses for criminal conviction applicants to balance public safety with employment rehabilitation.

Laid on the table subject to call
#criminaljustice #texasdepartmentof(v8788) #corrections--jails&prisons(i0092) #occupationalregulation--othertrades&professions(i0541)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 3673

Legislative bill overview

HB 3673 modifies Texas occupational licensing rules to allow revocation of licenses from certain current license holders and creates a pathway for individuals with criminal convictions to obtain provisional occupational licenses. The bill aims to balance public safety protections with rehabilitation and second-chance employment opportunities for people with criminal histories.

Why is this important

Occupational licensing significantly affects employment prospects and economic mobility. This bill directly impacts two groups: current license holders facing potential revocation and individuals with criminal records seeking to enter licensed professions. The outcomes will influence both public safety standards in regulated occupations and economic reintegration opportunities for formerly incarcerated individuals.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope of revocation: Unclear which specific criminal convictions trigger mandatory or discretionary license revocation, potentially creating inconsistent enforcement across professions
  • "Certain license holders" definition: The vague language about who faces revocation could lead to disputes over fairness and equal application of standards
  • Provisional license standards: Questions about what safeguards protect public safety while provisional licenses are held, and whether standards vary by occupation type
  • Rehabilitation vs. public protection: Tension between enabling employment for people with records versus maintaining licensing standards intended to protect consumers in regulated fields

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.