WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 757

Relating to the review, funding, and continuation of degree and certificate programs at public institutions of higher education based on certain performance standards.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Mayes Middleton

Texas bill ties public higher education program funding to performance standards, allowing defunding or discontinuation of underperforming degree and certificate programs.

Left pending in committee
#education--higher--finance(i0232) #education--higher--general(i0231) #education--higher--institutions&programs(i0223) #highereducationcoordinatingboard #texas(v4280) #studentloans(s0036) #statefinances--management&control(i0748)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 757

Legislative bill overview

SB 757 establishes performance-based review and funding mechanisms for degree and certificate programs at Texas public higher education institutions. The bill requires programs to meet specified performance standards or face potential defunding and discontinuation. It creates a framework where program continuation depends on measurable outcomes rather than historical funding patterns.

Why is this important

This bill could significantly reshape how Texas funds higher education by tying resources directly to program performance metrics. It may affect student access to certain degree programs, institutional budgeting priorities, and which academic disciplines receive continued state investment. The policy reflects broader debates about accountability in public education and the role of workforce needs versus academic freedom in determining program viability.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition of "performance standards": Disagreement over whether metrics should emphasize job placement rates, graduation rates, enrollment numbers, or other measures—with concern that workforce-focused metrics may disadvantage humanities and social sciences
  • Funding mechanism burden: Questions about whether defunding underperforming programs saves money or simply shifts costs to remaining programs and students through higher tuition
  • Institutional autonomy: Debate over whether state-mandated performance reviews infringe on university governance and academic decision-making authority
  • Equity concerns: Potential disproportionate impact on programs serving minority students or rural institutions with different demographic profiles and mission priorities

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.