WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 317

Relating to the removal, relocation, alteration, or construction of certain monuments or memorials located on public property; authorizing a civil penalty.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Brandon Creighton and 2 co-sponsors

Texas bill restricting removal/alteration of public monuments and memorials with civil penalties, limiting local authority over community public spaces.

Not again placed on intent calendar
#attorneygeneral(v2811) #citygovernment--general(i0060) #civilremedies&liabilities(i0065) #countygovernment--general(i0096) #education--higher--general(i0231) #historicalcommission #texas(v0238) #historicpreservation&museums(i0392) #publiclands #buildings&resources(i0630) #stateagencies #boards&commissions(i0749)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 317

Legislative bill overview

SB 317 would restrict the removal, relocation, alteration, or construction of monuments and memorials on public property in Texas and establish civil penalties for violations. The bill appears designed to protect existing monuments from being removed or substantially modified without authorization, though the specific criteria for which monuments are protected and exemption procedures are not detailed in the title alone.

Why is this important

Monument and memorial policies have become nationally contentious, particularly regarding Confederate monuments, historical accuracy, and community representation. This bill would create legal barriers to local communities or entities who wish to remove or relocate statues and memorials, potentially locking in current displays regardless of changing public sentiment or historical reassessment. The financial penalties add enforcement teeth to these restrictions.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope and definitions: The bill's language "certain monuments or memorials" is vague—it's unclear which specific monuments are protected, potentially creating litigation over applicability
  • Local control versus state mandate: The bill appears to override local government discretion in managing public spaces within their communities, raising questions about appropriate levels of governmental authority
  • Historical reassessment: The restriction could prevent communities from updating public displays to reflect more accurate historical narratives or remove symbols some constituents find offensive

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.