WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 1964

Relating to the regulation and use of artificial intelligence systems and the management of data by governmental entities.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Giovanni Capriglione and 1 co-sponsor

Texas law requiring state agencies to regulate AI systems and manage their data with transparency and accountability standards, effective Sept. 1, 2025.

Effective on 9/1/25
#attorneygeneral(v2811) #artificialintelligence(iq7c5) #citygovernment--general(i0060) #countygovernment--general(i0096) #ethics(i0345) #governor(i0375) #informationresources #departmentof(v9827) #publicnotice(s0264) #publicsectorartificialintelligencesystemsadvisoryboard(vr613) #purchasing--state(i0643) #staffdevelopment&training(s0317) #stateagencies #boards&commissions--admin.procedure(i0763) #boards&commissions--newlyproposed(i0773) #statefinances--management&control(i0748)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1964

Legislative bill overview

SB 1964 establishes regulatory requirements for how Texas governmental entities must manage artificial intelligence systems and the data they use. The bill sets standards for AI transparency, accountability, and data governance across state agencies, effective September 1, 2025.

Why is this important

As government agencies increasingly deploy AI for decision-making—from benefits determinations to law enforcement—this legislation addresses public concerns about algorithmic bias, data privacy, and lack of oversight. The bill creates enforceable rules to ensure taxpayer-funded AI systems operate with documented safeguards and public accountability.

Potential points of contention

  • Implementation costs: Agencies may require significant resources to audit existing systems, document AI processes, and achieve compliance by the September deadline
  • Definition and scope ambiguity: The bill's coverage of what qualifies as "AI systems" versus standard software may create compliance uncertainty and potential loopholes
  • Trade-offs between transparency and security: Requiring disclosure of AI decision-making processes could conflict with protecting government cybersecurity vulnerabilities or law enforcement investigative tactics

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.