WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 1288

Relating to the redesignation of the State Water Implementation Fund for Texas Advisory Committee as the Texas Water Fund Advisory Committee, the abolition of the Texas Infrastructure Resiliency Fund Advisory Committee, and the composition and functions of the Texas Water Fund Advisory Committee.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Charles Perry

Texas consolidates two water advisory committees into one unified Texas Water Fund Advisory Committee with modified composition and functions.

Referred to Water, Agriculture, & Rural Affairs
#disasterpreparedness&relief(i0211) #emergencymanagement #texasdivisionof(vp6fw) #fees&othernontaxrevenue--state(i0362) #houseofrepresentatives(v0096) #lieutenantgovernor(s0096) #senate #texas(v0227) #speakerofthehouse(s0306) #statefinances--appropriations(i0746) #statefinances--management&control(i0748) #texaswaterfundadvisorycommittee(vz131) #utilities--water&sewer(i0002) #water--development(i0875) #water--general(i0885)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1288

Legislative bill overview

SB 1288 restructures Texas water governance by renaming the State Water Implementation Fund for Texas Advisory Committee to the Texas Water Fund Advisory Committee, eliminates the Texas Infrastructure Resiliency Fund Advisory Committee, and modifies the composition and responsibilities of the resulting committee. The bill essentially consolidates two separate advisory bodies into one unified structure.

Why is this important

Water infrastructure and resilience planning are critical for Texas's growing population and drought vulnerability. Consolidating advisory committees can streamline decision-making and reduce administrative overhead, but may also reduce specialized focus on infrastructure resilience as a distinct priority area. How this committee is composed directly affects whose interests (agricultural, municipal, environmental, industrial) shape water policy recommendations.

Potential points of contention

  • Loss of specialized focus: Merging infrastructure resilience concerns into a general water fund committee may deprioritize resilience-specific planning during budget decisions
  • Committee composition concerns: The bill's changes to committee membership could shift power dynamics between stakeholder groups, potentially favoring some interests over others depending on final composition
  • Accountability reduction: Eliminating one advisory committee may reduce transparency and public input if its specific infrastructure resilience mandate isn't adequately preserved in the consolidated body

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.