WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 2080

RELATING TO THE PSYCHOLOGY INTERJURISDICTIONAL COMPACT.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Stanley Chang and 4 co-sponsors

Hawaii joins Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact enabling licensed psychologists to practice across state lines with temporary certificates while maintaining coordinated licensing standards and disciplinary oversight.

Report Adopted; Passed Third Reading. Ayes, 24; Aye(s) with reservations: Senator(s) Hashimoto, McKelvey. Noes, 1 (Senator(s) Awa). Excused, 0 (none). Transmitted to House.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2080

Legislative bill overview

SB 2080 would allow Hawaii to enter into the Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact (PSYPACT), an interstate agreement that streamlines licensing and practice standards for psychologists across participating states. This compact enables psychologists to obtain temporary practice certificates to provide services across state lines without requiring separate licensure in each state, while maintaining a centralized database and disciplinary oversight.

Why is this important

The compact addresses practical barriers to mental health care access, particularly in underserved or rural areas, and allows Hawaii residents to access psychological services from licensed providers in other states. It also creates opportunities for Hawaii psychologists to practice across state lines, potentially increasing professional mobility and economic opportunities while maintaining consumer protections through coordinated licensing standards.

Potential points of contention

  • Professional competition concerns: Hawaii psychologists may worry about increased competition from out-of-state providers, potentially affecting local practice sustainability and wages
  • Regulatory standardization: Hawaii would need to align its licensing standards with the compact's requirements, potentially requiring changes to existing state regulations and exam procedures
  • Consumer protection oversight: The centralized database system and reliance on other states' disciplinary actions could create gaps in protecting Hawaii consumers if enforcement mechanisms differ across jurisdictions

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.