WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 326

Relating to the procedure for determining whether a student's violation of a public school's or public institution of higher education's student code of conduct was motivated by antisemitism.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by César Blanco and 5 co-sponsors

Texas law now requires schools to assess whether student code violations were antisemitism-motivated when determining disciplinary consequences, effective immediately.

Effective immediately
#discrimination(s0052) #education--higher--general(i0231) #education--primary&secondary--discipline(i0244) #humanrelations(i0410) #religion(i0646)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 326

Legislative bill overview

SB 326 establishes a formal procedure for Texas public schools and higher education institutions to determine whether student code of conduct violations were motivated by antisemitism. The bill requires schools to evaluate whether violations constituted antisemitic acts when making disciplinary decisions and considers this motivation as a factor in determining appropriate consequences.

Why is this important

This legislation directly affects how schools investigate and discipline student conduct, potentially influencing severity of penalties and the record of misconduct. It reflects broader national concern about antisemitic incidents on campuses and in schools, while creating a specific legal framework for addressing motivation-based violations.

Potential points of contention

  • Definitional clarity: The bill's effectiveness depends on how schools define and identify "antisemitism" in conduct violations, which could be subjective and lead to inconsistent application across districts
  • Due process concerns: Critics may argue that requiring motivation assessment adds complexity to disciplinary proceedings and could disproportionately scrutinize students' speech or beliefs
  • Scope limitations: The bill addresses antisemitism specifically but not other forms of bias-motivated conduct (religious, racial, ethnic), raising questions about equal treatment and potential claims of selective protection

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.