WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 1495

Relating to the establishment of an Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment Advisory Board.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Charles Schwertner

SB 1495 proposes creating a Texas Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment Advisory Board to coordinate EV charging infrastructure policy, but the bill failed committee consideration in May 2025.

Failed to receive affirmative vote in comm.
#electricvehiclesupplyequipmentadvisoryboard(vd0gi) #electricvehicles(si3j9) #licensing&regulation #texascommissionof(v0383) #occupationalregulation--othertrades&professions(i0541) #safety(i0740) #stateagencies #boards&commissions--newlyproposed(i0773) #utilities--electric(i0831) #vehicles&traffic--general(i0865)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1495

Legislative bill overview

SB 1495 would establish an Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) Advisory Board in Texas to provide guidance on the development and deployment of EV charging infrastructure. The board would likely consist of stakeholders from utilities, charging networks, vehicle manufacturers, and government entities to coordinate policy recommendations.

Why is this important

As EV adoption accelerates nationwide, states are grappling with how to expand charging infrastructure efficiently. Texas, as a major energy and transportation hub, faces questions about whether private market development of charging networks is sufficient or whether government coordination could improve accessibility, particularly in rural areas. The board's recommendations could influence future legislation and investment decisions.

Potential points of contention

  • Cost and government involvement: Critics may argue the advisory board represents unnecessary government expansion into a sector that should be market-driven, while proponents contend coordination prevents duplicative infrastructure and ensures equitable coverage
  • Industry influence: The composition of board members could favor certain companies (utilities vs. private charging networks), creating concerns about whose interests are prioritized in recommendations
  • Regulatory scope: Unclear whether recommendations would lead to binding regulations or merely advisory guidance, and whether future legislation would require legislative action or allow regulatory implementation

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.