WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 256

Relating to the development of a severe weather adaptation plan by certain entities.

89th Legislature, 2nd Called Session (2025) Introduced by Rafael Anchía

Texas bill requiring specified entities to develop severe weather adaptation plans to improve infrastructure resilience and disaster preparedness.

Filed
#agriculture #departmentof(v0566) #comptrollerofpublicaccounts(v2608) #emergencymanagement #texasdivisionof(vp6fw) #environmentalquality #texascommissionon(v0334) #environment--general(i0340) #generallandoffice(v2808) #governor(i0375) #health&humanservicescommission(v0177) #housing&communityaffairs #texasdepartmentof(v0008) #insurance #texasdepartmentof(v0006) #internet(s0130) #legislature(i0520) #parks&wildlifedepartment(v0045) #publicsafety #departmentof(v0251) #publicutilitycommission(v0023) #stateagencies #boards&commissions(i0749) #texasa&mforestservice(u0213) #transportation #texasdepartmentof(v8796)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 256

Legislative bill overview

HB 256 requires certain entities in Texas to develop and implement severe weather adaptation plans to address climate resilience and infrastructure vulnerability. The bill establishes standards for how organizations must prepare for and respond to increasingly severe weather events, including planning requirements and potential coordination mechanisms.

Why is this important

Texas experiences significant economic losses and loss of life from severe weather events including hurricanes, floods, droughts, and ice storms. Requiring proactive adaptation planning can reduce infrastructure failures, protect public safety, and potentially lower disaster recovery costs by identifying vulnerabilities before catastrophic events occur.

Potential points of contention

  • Regulatory burden and costs: Affected entities may argue that mandatory adaptation planning creates unfunded mandates, requiring expensive infrastructure upgrades or operational changes without state financial support
  • Which entities are covered: Ambiguity about whether requirements apply to private utilities, municipalities, state agencies, or all of the above could create disputes about scope and fairness
  • Adaptation standards clarity: The bill's specificity regarding what constitutes an adequate adaptation plan remains unclear—vague standards could lead to compliance disputes or allow insufficient preparations

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.