WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 214

Relating to the designation and use of certain spaces and facilities according to sex; authorizing a civil penalty and a private civil right of action.

89th Legislature, 2nd Called Session (2025) Introduced by Daniel Alders and 62 co-sponsors

Texas bill requiring sex-based facility designations with civil penalties and private lawsuit rights; affects bathrooms and public spaces in schools and government buildings.

Referred to State Affairs
#attorneygeneral(v2811) #attorney'sfees(s0202) #birth&deathcertificates(s6418) #criminaljustice #texasboardof(v0740) #texasdepartmentof(v8788) #civilremedies&liabilities(i0065) #corrections--jails&prisons(i0092) #courts--general(i0160) #education--higher--general(i0231) #family--familyviolence(i0353) #genderidentity&expression(s0767) #politicalsubdivisions(i0588) #stateagencies #boards&commissions(i0749) #texaswomen'sprivacyact(ph8l1) #women'sshelters(s0049) #women(i0925)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 214

Legislative bill overview

HB 214 would establish requirements for the designation and use of certain public spaces and facilities based on biological sex. The bill creates civil penalties for non-compliance and grants individuals a private right of action to sue for violations, meaning private citizens could initiate lawsuits without relying solely on government enforcement.

Why is this important

This legislation would directly affect access policies in spaces like bathrooms, locker rooms, and potentially other facilities in public institutions. The bill's private right of action mechanism shifts enforcement burden to individuals, potentially creating numerous lawsuits and significantly altering how schools, government buildings, and public facilities operate.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition clarity: The bill's specific definitions of "biological sex" and which "certain spaces" are covered are not detailed in this summary, creating uncertainty about scope and application
  • Constitutional concerns: Similar legislation has faced legal challenges on equal protection and due process grounds; enforcement costs could be substantial
  • Implementation burden: Schools and public entities would need new policies, staff training, and monitoring systems, with costs passed to taxpayers
  • Privacy and dignity conflicts: Different stakeholder groups have competing concerns about privacy, safety, and inclusion in shared facilities

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.