WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 1801

Relating to the definition of authorized peace officer for purposes of certain laws governing the installation and use of tracking equipment and access to certain communications.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Salman Bhojani

Texas bill clarifying which law enforcement officers can legally use tracking equipment and access communications data, affecting surveillance authority scope and privacy protections.

Left pending in committee
#citygovernment--employees/officers(i0061) #countygovernment--employees/officers(i0095) #crimes--miscellaneous(i0200) #criminalprocedure--general(i0208) #electronicinformationsystems(i0311) #insurance #commissionerof(v0396) #insurance--general(i0445) #lawenforcement(i0510) #occupationalregulation--othertrades&professions(i0541) #peaceofficers(s0007)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1801

Legislative bill overview

HB 1801 modifies the definition of "authorized peace officer" under Texas law as it applies to the installation and use of tracking equipment and access to certain communications. The bill appears designed to clarify or expand which law enforcement personnel can legally deploy surveillance tools like GPS trackers and access electronic communications data.

Why is this important

This bill directly affects the scope of surveillance authority in Texas by determining which officers can use tracking and communication monitoring tools. The outcome impacts both law enforcement's investigative capabilities and citizens' privacy protections, as it defines who has legal power to deploy intrusive monitoring technologies.

Potential points of contention

  • Privacy advocates' concerns: Expanding the definition of authorized officers could broaden surveillance authority beyond traditional police, potentially increasing privacy intrusions without adequate oversight
  • Law enforcement perspective: Narrowing or clarifying the definition might restrict officers' investigative tools, potentially hampering criminal investigations or creating jurisdictional gaps
  • Warrant requirements: Unclear whether the bill maintains or modifies existing judicial oversight requirements for surveillance tool deployment

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.