WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 739

Relating to the definition of authorized peace officer for purposes of certain laws governing the installation and use of tracking equipment and access to certain communications.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Salman Bhojani and 1 co-sponsor

SB 739 broadens which Texas law enforcement officers can install tracking equipment and access communications data, expanding surveillance authority effective September 1, 2025.

Effective on 9/1/25
#citygovernment--employees/officers(i0061) #countygovernment--employees/officers(i0095) #crimes--miscellaneous(i0200) #criminalprocedure--general(i0208) #electronicinformationsystems(i0311) #insurance #commissionerof(v0396) #insurance--general(i0445) #lawenforcement(i0510) #occupationalregulation--othertrades&professions(i0541) #peaceofficers(s0007)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 739

Legislative bill overview

SB 739 expands the definition of "authorized peace officer" in Texas law to include additional officer categories for purposes of installing tracking equipment and accessing communications data. The bill modifies existing statutes governing surveillance capabilities by broadening which law enforcement personnel can utilize these tools under current legal frameworks.

Why is this important

This change affects the scope of surveillance authority in Texas by allowing a wider range of law enforcement officials to deploy tracking devices and access communications without necessarily requiring a warrant or additional judicial oversight for these expanded officer categories. It impacts both privacy protections and law enforcement capabilities across the state.

Potential points of contention

  • Privacy concerns: Expanding who can access tracking and communications data may decrease privacy protections if the expanded officer categories face lower authorization standards than traditional peace officers
  • Definitional ambiguity: The bill's effectiveness depends on how "authorized peace officer" is specifically defined, which could create inconsistent application across jurisdictions
  • Accountability mechanisms: Unclear whether expanded officer categories face the same oversight, training requirements, and accountability measures as traditional peace officers when using surveillance tools

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.