WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 2969

Relating to the creation of the criminal offense of trespass in a facility housing an animal and to restitution for property damage resulting from that trespass.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Barbara Gervin-Hawkins and 2 co-sponsors

Texas bill criminalizes trespassing in animal facilities and requires trespassers to pay restitution for property damage, targeting activist entry while raising First Amendment concerns.

Placed on General State Calendar
#animals(i0035) #courts--civilprocedure(i0135) #crimes--againstproperty(i0175) #trespass(s0549)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2969

Legislative bill overview

SB 2969 creates a new criminal offense for trespassing in facilities that house animals and establishes restitution requirements for property damage caused during such trespassing. The bill targets unauthorized entry into spaces like animal shelters, farms, laboratories, or other animal-housing facilities, making it a distinct crime separate from general trespass laws.

Why is this important

Animal facilities have become targets for activists and protesters seeking to document conditions or remove animals, creating security and operational concerns for facility owners. This bill provides specific legal tools to prosecute unauthorized entry and recover financial damages, which facilities argue they need to protect operations, animal welfare protocols, and worker safety. The measure reflects growing tensions between animal advocacy groups and facility operators over access and transparency.

Potential points of contention

  • First Amendment concerns: Activist groups may argue the law chills legitimate protest and investigative journalism by criminalizing facility access, potentially preventing exposure of animal welfare violations
  • Scope and definition ambiguity: The bill's definition of "facility housing an animal" could be interpreted broadly (farms, zoos, shelters, private homes with pets) or narrowly, creating uncertainty about enforcement
  • Restitution provisions: Questions remain about what constitutes compensable "property damage" and whether restitution could be weaponized against good-faith whistleblowers or activists documenting abuse

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.