WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 2372

Relating to the authority of certain special districts to use operation and maintenance ad valorem tax funds to pay the costs of contracting for or employing peace officers.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Jared Patterson

Allows Texas special districts to use maintenance tax revenue for contracted or employed law enforcement officers, redirecting infrastructure funds toward security costs.

No action taken in committee
#firefighters&police--general(i0370) #lawenforcement(i0510) #peaceofficers(s0007) #specialdistricts&authorities--water&utility(i0755)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2372

Legislative bill overview

HB 2372 authorizes certain special districts in Texas to use operation and maintenance (O&M) ad valorem tax funds to pay for contracted or employed peace officers. Currently, special districts may have restrictions on how O&M funds can be allocated. This bill expands their financial flexibility to dedicate these revenues toward law enforcement services.

Why is this important

Special districts (water districts, drainage districts, etc.) often serve rural or underserved areas where law enforcement resources are limited. This bill could enable them to directly fund security personnel for their facilities and operations without seeking separate tax authority. However, it also redirects public funds initially collected for maintenance operations toward personnel costs, potentially affecting other district services.

Potential points of contention

  • Budget reallocation concerns: O&M funds are designated for maintaining infrastructure; redirecting them to law enforcement may reduce money available for actual maintenance, potentially affecting system upkeep and service quality.
  • Taxpayer intent mismatch: Voters approved O&M tax increases for infrastructure maintenance, not law enforcement; using these funds for peace officers may violate the original purpose voters supported.
  • Scope ambiguity: The bill's reference to "certain special districts" lacks clear definition—it's unclear which districts qualify or what limitations apply to officer hiring and deployment.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.