WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 957

Relating to restrictive covenants in health care provider agreements; declaring an emergency.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Ben Bowman and 7 co-sponsors

SB 957 restricts or prohibits restrictive covenants in healthcare provider agreements to increase provider mobility and competition.

In committee upon adjournment.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 957

Legislative bill overview

SB 957 addresses restrictive covenants in health care provider employment agreements, likely limiting non-compete, non-solicitation, or confidentiality clauses that prevent healthcare workers from practicing after leaving their employers. The bill declares an emergency, suggesting the sponsors view this as an urgent matter requiring immediate action.

Why is this important

Restrictive covenants in healthcare can limit worker mobility, potentially reduce competition among providers, and create access-to-care issues in underserved areas by preventing providers from establishing practices where needed. These agreements may also suppress wages and working conditions, as providers face barriers to seeking better employment opportunities.

Potential points of contention

  • Provider business interests vs. worker mobility: Healthcare organizations argue restrictive covenants protect investments in training and patient relationships, while workers' advocates argue they unfairly restrict employment freedom and suppress compensation.
  • Rural healthcare access: Some argue restrictive covenants keep providers in underserved areas, while others contend they instead prevent providers from moving to areas with greater need or opportunity.
  • Scope of restrictions: Disagreement likely exists over which covenant types should be prohibited entirely versus reasonably limited (trade secrets, patient lists, genuine competition concerns).

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.