WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 239

Relating to regulations and policies for entering or using certain private spaces; authorizing a civil penalty.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Daniel Alders and 81 co-sponsors

Texas bill HB 239 creates new entry and usage regulations for certain private spaces with civil penalty enforcement, though specific covered venues remain unclear from available information.

Referred to State Affairs
#attorneygeneral(v2811) #attorney'sfees(s0202) #birth&deathcertificates(s6418) #civilremedies&liabilities(i0065) #corrections--jails&prisons(i0092) #courts--general(i0160) #education--higher--general(i0231) #family--familyviolence(i0353) #politicalsubdivisions(i0588) #stateagencies #boards&commissions(i0749) #texaswomen'sprivacyact(ph8l1) #women(i0925)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 239

Legislative bill overview

HB 239 establishes new regulations and policies governing entry into and use of certain private spaces in Texas, with enforcement through civil penalties. The bill was filed in November 2024, read for the first time in February 2025, and referred to the State Affairs Committee. The specific private spaces covered and detailed regulatory framework are not publicly available in the basic bill metadata provided.

Why is this important

Private space regulations affect property rights, business operations, and individual access/trespassing laws. Civil penalty structures determine enforcement mechanisms and potential financial consequences for violations. The scope of "certain private spaces" could significantly impact various sectors depending on which venues are included.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition clarity: The vague reference to "certain private spaces" creates uncertainty about which properties are covered—this could affect restaurants, retail stores, private clubs, residential properties, or other venues differently
  • Civil penalty framework: The bill's penalty structure (amount, due process, appeal mechanisms) could be perceived as either insufficient deterrent or excessive burden depending on stakeholder perspective
  • Property owner rights vs. access rights: Potential tension between private property owners' autonomy and legislative mandates about who can enter or how spaces must be used

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.