WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 10

Relating to reforming the procedure by which state agencies adopt rules and impose regulatory requirements and the deference given to the interpretation of laws and rules by state agencies in certain judicial proceedings.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Jeff Barry and 45 co-sponsors

Texas bill limiting state agency rulemaking authority and reducing judicial deference to agency legal interpretations, shifting power toward legislature and courts.

Laid on the table subject to call
#business&commerce--general(i0050) #courts--general(i0160) #governor(i0375) #informationresources #departmentof(v9827) #regulatoryefficiencyoffice #texas(vt0ld) #regulatoryreform&efficiencyact(pp2qe) #secretaryofstate(v0042) #stateagencies'rules(s0346) #stateagencies #boards&commissions(i0749) #boards&commissions--admin.procedure(i0763) #boards&commissions--newlyproposed(i0773)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 10

Legislative bill overview

HB 10 reforms how Texas state agencies create and enforce regulations, and changes how courts treat agency interpretations of laws. The bill appears to reduce regulatory authority by modifying the rulemaking process and limiting judicial deference to agency interpretations—a practice where courts traditionally give weight to how agencies interpret laws they administer.

Why is this important

This directly affects how Texas government operates at the agency level and determines what power agencies have versus the legislature and courts. Citizens and businesses encounter agency regulations daily (environmental rules, licensing requirements, workplace standards), so changes here impact compliance costs, enforcement consistency, and access to regulatory processes.

Potential points of contention

  • Deference standards: Reducing deference to agency interpretations could increase litigation and create uncertainty, as courts would second-guess agency decisions more frequently; agencies argue this expertise-based deference ensures consistent implementation
  • Rulemaking procedures: Stricter procedural requirements for rule adoption could slow regulatory response to emergencies or market changes, but may increase public input and legislative oversight
  • Industry vs. consumer impact: Businesses may face less predictable regulations (potentially beneficial), while consumers may lose protections if agencies have weaker enforcement authority

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.