WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 3742

Relating to prohibiting public institutions of higher education from providing instruction regarding the use of gender pronouns.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Caroline Harris Davila and 11 co-sponsors

Texas bill prohibits public colleges from instructing on gender pronoun usage, restricting curriculum content and diversity training at universities.

Referred to Higher Education
#education--higher--healthinstitutions(i0237) #education--higher--institutions&programs(i0223) #genderidentity&expression(s0767) #highereducationcoordinatingboard #texas(v4280)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 3742

Legislative bill overview

HB 3742 would prohibit public colleges and universities in Texas from providing any instruction, training, or guidance to students or employees regarding the use of gender pronouns. This includes classroom instruction, diversity initiatives, and employee orientation programs that address pronoun usage or related topics.

Why is this important

This bill directly affects how public higher education institutions can address gender identity in academic and workplace settings. It would restrict institutional autonomy in curriculum design and diversity training while potentially impacting student experience, faculty teaching practices, and institutional policies around inclusive environments.

Potential points of contention

  • Academic freedom concerns: Critics argue the bill constrains faculty ability to teach relevant topics in fields like linguistics, literature, sociology, and gender studies, and limits classroom discussion of contemporary social issues.
  • Institutional autonomy: Universities typically have discretion over curriculum and employee training; this bill represents significant state-level override of institutional decision-making.
  • Practical implementation challenges: Unclear how broadly the prohibition applies—whether it covers all mentions of pronouns in any context or only specific instruction about non-traditional pronouns, and how institutions would enforce compliance.
  • Legal exposure: Potential First Amendment and free speech questions regarding restrictions on institutional speech and academic instruction.
  • Student and employee concerns: Supporters argue it prevents ideological instruction; critics worry it creates hostile environments for transgender and non-binary students and staff.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.