WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 146

Relating to: prohibiting persons who have been convicted of a violent crime from changing their name and providing a penalty.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Dan Feyen and 3 co-sponsors

SB 146 sought to strengthen private property rights by limiting local government regulations and ensuring property owners could effectively challenge government actions.

Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 146

Summary of SB 146: Creating the Private Property Protection Act

Bill Overview

Bill Number: SB 146
Title: Creating the Private Property Protection Act
Status: Died in Process
Introduced: January 04, 2025
Classification: Bill
Subject Areas: Courts, Environmental Protection, Local Government, Planning and Development, Property

Purpose and Intent

The Private Property Protection Act was introduced with the intent to enhance the protection of private property rights. The bill aimed to establish clearer guidelines and legal frameworks to safeguard property owners from potential overreach by local governments and regulatory bodies, particularly in the context of environmental regulations and land use planning.

Key Provisions

While the specific text of the bill is not detailed in the provided information, the following key provisions can be inferred based on the bill's title and subject areas:

  • Strengthening Property Rights: The bill likely proposed measures to ensure that property owners have robust legal recourse against government actions that may infringe upon their property rights.
  • Regulatory Oversight: It may have included provisions to limit the ability of local governments to impose regulations that could adversely affect private property without just compensation.
  • Judicial Processes: The bill might have aimed to streamline court processes related to property disputes, ensuring that property owners can effectively challenge governmental actions.

Impact

The Private Property Protection Act would have primarily affected:

  • Property Owners: Individuals and businesses owning property would benefit from enhanced protections against government actions that could diminish their property rights.
  • Local Governments: The bill could have imposed additional constraints on how local governments manage land use and environmental regulations, potentially affecting their planning and development processes.
  • Judicial System: Courts would have seen an increase in cases related to property rights, requiring adjustments in handling such disputes.

Legislative Timeline

The legislative journey of SB 146 included several key actions:

  • January 04, 2025: Bill introduced.
  • January 16, 2025: Referred to the Judiciary Committee.
  • January 26, 2025: Hearing held in the Judiciary Committee.
  • February 05, 2025: Committee passed the bill as amended.
  • February 13, 2025: Scheduled for 2nd reading, but the motion to pass failed, leading to indefinite postponement.
  • March 12, 2025: Missed the deadline for general bill transmittal.
  • May 23, 2025: Bill officially died in process.

Conclusion

Although SB 146 aimed to create a framework for the protection of private property rights, it ultimately did not progress through the legislative process. The failure to advance past the committee stage and subsequent readings highlights the challenges faced in enacting legislation related to property rights and local governance.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.