WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 4298

Relating to parental controls and filters for certain explicit material on electronic devices; providing a civil penalty.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Matt Shaheen

Texas bill mandates electronic device makers include parental content filters or face civil penalties, shifting child safety responsibility from parents to manufacturers.

Referred to Trade, Workforce & Economic Development
#attorneygeneral(v2811) #business&commerce--general(i0050) #computers&software(s2425) #civilremedies&liabilities(i0065) #electronicinformationsystems(i0311) #minors--health&safety(i0533)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 4298

Legislative bill overview

HB 4298 requires manufacturers of electronic devices sold in Texas to include parental control and filtering software capable of blocking explicit material. The bill establishes civil penalties for manufacturers who fail to comply with these requirements, though specific penalty amounts and enforcement mechanisms are not detailed in the available information.

Why is this important

This legislation addresses parental concerns about children's access to adult content on personal devices by shifting responsibility to manufacturers rather than relying solely on parental vigilance. It represents a significant regulatory approach to content filtering that could affect how technology companies design and distribute devices in Texas, potentially influencing national product standards if other states follow suit.

Potential points of contention

  • First Amendment concerns: Critics may argue that mandating filtering software infringes on free speech rights and device functionality for adult users
  • Technical feasibility and effectiveness: Parental control systems vary widely in effectiveness; the bill doesn't specify filtering standards, creating ambiguity about compliance benchmarks
  • Economic impact on manufacturers: Adding mandatory filtering features increases production costs and could disadvantage smaller manufacturers or create market distortions
  • Enforcement and definitions: The bill's lack of specific definitions for "explicit material" and unclear civil penalty structure may create litigation and compliance challenges
  • Consumer choice limitations: Mandating pre-installed filters reduces user autonomy in device configuration and may inconvenience adults who don't need such restrictions

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.