WeVote

Bill

WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 707

Summary of SB 707: Authority of the Legislature on Federal Directives

Bill Number: SB 707
Introduced: January 6, 2025
Status: Referred to State Affairs
Subject Areas: Federal Relations, State Agencies, State Employees

Purpose and Intent

SB 707 aims to empower the Texas Legislature to determine the constitutionality of certain federal directives and to prohibit state government officers and employees from enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of directives deemed unconstitutional. This bill reflects a broader trend of state-level resistance to federal authority, particularly concerning directives that state lawmakers believe infringe upon state rights.

Key Provisions

The bill introduces a new chapter (Chapter 394) to the Texas Government Code, which includes the following significant provisions:

  1. Definitions:

    • Federal Directive: Includes federal laws, executive orders, and rules or policies from federal agencies.
    • Unconstitutional Federal Directive: Defined as any federal directive that infringes on powers reserved to the states by the Tenth Amendment or limits the state's ability to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens.
  2. Legislative Authority:

    • The legislature may determine a federal directive as unconstitutional through a concurrent resolution.
    • The resolution can also prohibit specific government officers or employees from enforcing the unconstitutional directive.
  3. Requirements for Filing a Resolution:

    • A member of the legislature must obtain approval from the Speaker of the House or the Lieutenant Governor, or secure a two-thirds vote from the members present in their respective house before filing a resolution.
  4. Contents of the Resolution:

    • Must identify the federal directive in question, explain the basis for its unconstitutionality, specify which officers or employees are prohibited from enforcement, and outline any additional requirements.
  5. Repeal of Resolution:

    • A concurrent resolution can only be repealed by another concurrent resolution filed and adopted in the same manner.
  6. Legislative Inaction:

    • The lack of legislative action on a federal directive does not imply its constitutionality nor limit the Attorney General's authority to challenge it.

Impact

  • Affected Parties: The bill primarily affects state government officers and employees, as well as potentially impacting the enforcement of federal laws within Texas.
  • State vs. Federal Relations: This legislation could lead to increased tensions between state and federal authorities, particularly in areas where state lawmakers believe federal directives overreach.
  • Implementation Timeline: The bill takes effect immediately if it receives a two-thirds vote from both houses; otherwise, it will take effect on September 1, 2025.

Legislative Actions

  • The bill has undergone several committee hearings and votes, with a favorable report issued on March 5, 2025. It has been placed on the intent calendar multiple times, indicating ongoing legislative interest and potential for further discussion.

Conclusion

SB 707 represents a significant assertion of state authority over federal directives, with implications for the enforcement of federal laws in Texas. The bill's passage could set a precedent for similar actions in other states, reflecting a growing movement towards state sovereignty in the face of federal regulations.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.