WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 786

Relating to: food allergen training and certificates of food protection practices, rules addressing food allergens, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by André Jacque

The bill would require allergen-specific training, establish certificates for meal safety practices, and grant rulemaking authority to enforce standardized allergen controls.

Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 786

Summary of Wisconsin Senate Bill 786 (2025)

Overview

  • Title: Relating to: food allergen training and certificates of food protection practices, rules addressing food allergens, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
  • Session/Jurisdiction: Wisconsin, 2025
  • Sponsor: Senator André Jacque (cosponsored by Rep. Kreibich, Subeck, and Sinicki)
  • Status: Introduced December 22, 2025; read first time and referred to the Committee on Agriculture and Revenue. Action history notes submission and subsequent committee referral; no passage at the time of the provided record.

Purpose and intent

The bill centers on improving food safety regarding allergens. It proposes:
- Food allergen training requirements for certain food service stakeholders.
- Certificates of food protection practices to credential compliance with allergen-related safety standards.
- Rules addressing food allergens to establish or modify regulations governing allergen prevention, labeling, handling, and related practices.
- Granting rule-making authority to a designated agency (likely related to food safety) to implement, update, or enforce these provisions.

In summary, the bill aims to strengthen prevention of allergen contaminations in the food sector and ensure trained personnel hold recognized certifications demonstrating proper allergen controls.

Key provisions (as inferred from the bill’s title and related language)

Note: Specific section-by-section text is not provided in the excerpt. The following outlines reflect the bill’s stated focus areas.

  • Training requirements for food industry personnel

    • Mandate or authorize allergen-specific training for employees in certain food establishments (e.g., restaurants, grocers, food processing facilities).
    • Potential standards for training content (identification of major food allergens, cross-contact prevention, cleaning protocols, communication with customers).
  • Certificates of food protection practices

    • Establish a program or framework for certificates that verify practices to prevent allergen contamination and ensure safe handling.
    • Criteria for earning, renewing, and potentially displaying or recognizing certificates.
  • Rules addressing food allergens

    • Develop or revise rules dealing with allergen labeling, elimination of cross-contact, procurement of ingredients, storage separation, and sanitation.
    • Possible alignment with federal allergen labeling concepts or state-specific requirements.
  • Rule-making authority

    • Delegation of authority to a state agency (likely the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection or a similar agency) to create, modify, or enforce allergen-related rules.
    • Provisions for rule adoption timelines, public review, and possible costs or exemptions.

Affected entities and stakeholders

  • Food service establishments (restaurants, cafeterias, food courts)
  • Food processing and manufacturing facilities
  • Food retailers and grocers
  • Employees and managers responsible for food handling and safety
  • Regulatory agencies tasked with food safety, consumer protection, and health standards
  • Consumers who rely on allergen safety and proper labeling

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and referral: The bill was introduced on December 22, 2025, and referred to the Committee on Agriculture and Revenue for consideration.
  • Legislative progress: The action history indicates an attempt to pass via Senate Joint Resolution 1 on March 23, 2026, but it did not pass at that time. No final passage status is provided in the excerpt.
  • Rule-making timeline: If enacted, rules would be developed and implemented by the relevant state agency, with a formal rule adoption process likely including public comment and phased effective dates.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Public health and safety: Enhanced allergen controls could reduce accidental exposures and improve consumer protection for individuals with food allergies.
  • Compliance costs: Businesses may incur costs related to training, certification, recordkeeping, and potential facility or process changes.
  • Workforce development: Creation of training programs and certifications could standardize industry practices and improve workforce competency in allergen management.
  • Regulatory clarity: Clear rules and a dedicated rule-making pathway may streamline enforcement and consistency across jurisdictions.

If you would like, I can tailor this summary to focus on a particular stakeholder group (e.g., small businesses, public health advocates) or incorporate any available fiscal or procedural analyses once they are released.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.