WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 267

Relating to defenses to prosecution for certain offenses involving material or conduct that is obscene or otherwise harmful to children.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Ben Bumgarner and 15 co-sponsors

HB 267 creates legal defenses for Texas prosecutions involving obscene or child-harmful material, potentially protecting legitimate professional conduct while raising concerns about enforcement impact.

Laid on the table subject to call
#courts--judges(i0140) #crimes--againstpersons--general(i0170) #crimes--againstpersons--sexual(i0171) #criminalprocedure--general(i0208) #librarycollectiondevelopment&materials(se35p) #lawenforcement(i0510) #libraries&librarians(i0523) #minors--crimesagainst(i0532)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 267

Legislative bill overview

HB 267 establishes legal defenses for individuals prosecuted under Texas laws prohibiting obscene material or content harmful to children. The bill allows defendants to argue specific circumstances or contexts that would shield them from criminal liability for possessing, distributing, or producing such material.

Why is this important

Child protection laws carry serious criminal penalties, including felony convictions and sex offender registration. This bill affects how strictly those laws apply by creating exceptions—potentially protecting educators, parents, medical professionals, or others who might encounter such material in legitimate contexts. The scope and application of these defenses will significantly impact enforcement and prosecutorial discretion.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope of defenses unclear: The bill language doesn't specify which defenses apply to which offenses, creating ambiguity about whether serious crimes (child sexual abuse material) receive the same protections as obscenity charges
  • Balancing protection vs. prosecution: Broad defenses could complicate child exploitation investigations and prosecution, while narrow defenses may inadequately protect professionals like doctors or educators
  • Definition disputes: What constitutes a legitimate "defense" versus what amounts to a loophole for harmful conduct will likely face disagreement between public safety advocates and civil liberties proponents

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.