RELATING TO CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES.
HB 70 aimed to improve emergency medical care for operational canines, clarifying EMTs' roles and protecting veterinarians from liability, but was vetoed.
HB 70 aimed to improve emergency medical care for operational canines, clarifying EMTs' roles and protecting veterinarians from liability, but was vetoed.
Bill Number: HB 70
Title: An Act relating to emergency medical services for operational canines; relating to the powers, duties, and liability of emergency medical technicians and mobile intensive care paramedics; relating to the practice of veterinary medicine; relating to civil liability of veterinarians; and providing for an effective date.
Status: Vetoed by Governor on July 16, 2025
Introduced: January 27, 2025
Classification: Bill
Subject: Animals, Medical Care, Occupations & Professions
The primary aim of HB 70 is to enhance the provision of emergency medical services for operational canines, such as police and search-and-rescue dogs. The bill seeks to clarify the roles and responsibilities of emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and mobile intensive care paramedics in providing medical care to these animals. Additionally, it addresses the practice of veterinary medicine and the civil liability of veterinarians in the context of emergency services for canines.
Emergency Medical Services for Canines: The bill establishes guidelines for EMTs and paramedics to provide emergency medical care to operational canines, ensuring that these animals receive timely and appropriate treatment in emergency situations.
Powers and Duties of EMTs and Paramedics: It outlines the specific powers and duties of EMTs and mobile intensive care paramedics when responding to emergencies involving canines, including the administration of medical procedures and medications.
Veterinary Practice Regulations: The bill includes provisions that relate to the practice of veterinary medicine, particularly in emergency contexts, ensuring that veterinarians are equipped to handle situations involving operational canines.
Civil Liability Protections: It proposes changes to the civil liability framework for veterinarians, potentially offering protections when they provide emergency care to operational canines, thereby encouraging more veterinarians to participate in such services.
Operational Canines: The bill would directly benefit operational canines by ensuring they receive necessary medical attention during emergencies, which could improve their health outcomes and effectiveness in their roles.
Emergency Medical Personnel: EMTs and paramedics would gain clarity on their responsibilities and legal protections when providing care to canines, which may enhance their willingness to assist in such situations.
Veterinarians: The proposed changes to civil liability could encourage more veterinarians to engage in emergency care for operational canines, knowing they have legal protections in place.
In summary, HB 70 aimed to improve emergency medical services for operational canines while clarifying the roles of medical personnel and veterinarians in such situations. Despite its potential benefits, the bill was vetoed and did not advance into law.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.