WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SJR 15

Relating to: condemning the pardons and sentence commutations of individuals involved in the violent attack on law enforcement officers at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Tim Carpenter and 14 co-sponsors

Amends NM Constitution to create a nine-member appointed State Board of Education that sets policy for public schools and appoints a superintendent to run PED.

Failed to adopt pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SJR 15

Summary — SJR 15: Appointed State Board of Education (Constitutional Amendment), New Mexico

Status: Action postponed indefinitely (6/3/2025)
Introduced: November 12, 2024
Type: Joint resolution (constitutional amendment)
Primary sponsors: Sen. William P. Soules; Cosponsors: W. Sharer, B. Shendo, others

Main purpose / intent

SJR 15 proposes amending Article XII, Section 6 of the New Mexico Constitution to replace the current governance arrangement for public education with an appointed State Board of Education (SBE) that would set policy for public schools and appoint a superintendent of public instruction to run the Public Education Department (PED). The resolution would put the amendment before voters (next general election — November 2026 — or an earlier special election) and would take effect only if approved.

Key provisions

  • Establishes a nine‑member State Board of Education (SBE), appointed “as provided by law,” required to be New Mexico residents with knowledge/experience in New Mexico public education.
  • Transfers policymaking, control, management and financial direction for public schools to SBE (subject to law).
  • SBE would appoint a superintendent of public instruction to direct PED operations pursuant to board policy and law. The superintendent must be a “qualified, experienced New Mexico licensed (or eligible licensed, per floor amendment) educational administrator,” allowing candidates from outside the state who could obtain NM licensure.
  • The current PED secretary would serve as superintendent until SBE appoints a replacement.
  • Retains the Public Education Commission (PEC) — the elected 10‑member body that authorizes state‑chartered charter schools — and preserves its duties.
  • Leaves many implementation details (appointment process, terms, qualifications, enabling powers) to be specified by statute; extensive statutory/regulatory revision would be required if adopted.

Who would be affected

  • Public Education Department (PED): governance and leadership selection would shift from the governor (who currently appoints the PED secretary) to the appointed SBE.
  • Governor and executive branch: loss of direct appointment power over PED secretary.
  • Public Education Commission (PEC): remains in place as chartering authority; its role largely preserved.
  • Educators, district and school leaders, and local school boards: policy direction and state governance structure could change.
  • New Mexico voters: would decide the constitutional change at the ballot; future elections for any board‑related offices or confirmations could be affected by enabling statutes.

Fiscal and administrative impacts

  • No appropriation included. Estimated one‑time state election/publication cost to place the amendment on the ballot: $35,000–$50,000 (Secretary of State costs to print and publish constitutional amendment text in both English and Spanish and to accommodate ballot logistics).
  • If approved, the Legislature would need to enact enabling laws to define appointment procedures, terms, and other administrative details; significant statutory and regulatory work would follow.
  • LESC/LFC analyses note potential impacts on PED organization, and highlight uncertainty about long‑term effects on student outcomes; historical context: prior to 2003 New Mexico had a policymaking state board and a superintendent; since 2003 PED has been a cabinet department headed by a governor‑appointed secretary.

Procedural / timeline notes

  • As a constitutional amendment, adoption requires voter approval at the next general election (Nov 2026) or a special election called for that purpose.
  • The resolution does not itself specify who appoints SBE members or their term lengths — those are left to future statute.
  • The measure conflicted with other pending resolutions (House Joint Resolutions 4 & 13, Senate Joint Resolution 3) proposing alternative governance changes.
  • Committee actions: reported Do Pass by the Senate Education Committee (6–2) and by Senate Rules (5–3); final legislative action recorded as “action postponed indefinitely” on 6/3/2025.

Issues and open questions identified by analyses

  • Lack of specificity about appointment authority (who appoints members), term lengths, and appointment/confirmation process.
  • Need to clarify interaction between the proposed property of law and existing school funding and authority statutes.
  • Unclear whether statutory power to define appointment criteria could permit future Legislatures to change board composition via statute rather than constitution.
  • Potential benefits (leadership stability) and uncertain effects on student outcomes; governance structure alone is not strongly correlated with NAEP performance per LESC.

Sources: Legislative Finance Committee fiscal notes, Legislative Education Study Committee analysis, committee reports, legislative history.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.