WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 4087

Relating to censorship of or certain other interference with digital expression, including expression on social media platforms or through electronic mail messages.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Richard Hayes

Texas bill prohibiting government censorship of digital expression and social media content to protect online free speech rights.

Referred to State Affairs
#civilremedies&liabilities(i0065) #commoncarriers(i0070) #discrimination(s0052) #email&electroniccommunications(s0321) #electronicinformationsystems(i0311) #internet(s0130)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 4087

Legislative bill overview

HB 4087 addresses government restrictions on digital expression and social media content. The bill appears designed to protect individuals' rights to communicate online without certain forms of government censorship or interference, though the specific enforcement mechanisms and definitions require examination of the full text.

Why is this important

Digital expression has become central to modern civic participation, commerce, and personal communication. Laws governing what government can restrict online directly impact free speech rights, platform moderation policies, and the balance between protecting public safety and preserving individual expression rights.

Potential points of contention

  • First Amendment boundaries: Determining what constitutes illegal "censorship" versus legitimate government regulation (like restricting threats or fraud) involves complex constitutional questions
  • Platform liability: The bill's treatment of social media platforms' own moderation decisions versus government action could conflict with Section 230 protections and platforms' editorial rights
  • Enforcement clarity: Without seeing specific language, the definition of "interference" with digital expression may be too broad or too narrow, creating litigation uncertainty
  • Public safety exceptions: The bill's approach to restricting genuinely harmful speech (threats, incitement, exploitation) versus protected political or controversial speech remains unclear

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.