WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

AB 661

Relating to: an audit of fire sprinkler systems in certain residential buildings and making an appropriation. (FE)

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Brienne Brown and 15 co-sponsors

DSS must contract with entities to study and recommend a permanent statewide Guaranteed Income Program, including funding, design, data sharing, and implementation, with findings d

Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · AB 661

Important note: the header/title you provided (an audit of fire sprinkler systems) does not match the bill text in the documents. The official bill text and legislative digest provided describe AB 661 as the "Guaranteed Income Research and Expansion Act" concerning a statewide guaranteed-income feasibility study. This summary follows the bill text in the documents you supplied.

AB 661 — Summary (Guaranteed Income Research and Expansion Act)

Purpose / Intent

AB 661 directs the State Department of Social Services (DSS) to contract with one or more qualified entities to produce comprehensive recommendations for designing, funding, and implementing a permanent, statewide Guaranteed Income Program in California. The study is intended to identify sustainable funding, administrative structures, target populations, and safeguards to preserve other safety-net benefits.

Key provisions

  • DSS must contract with qualified entity(ies) to develop recommendations to design, fund, and implement a permanent statewide Guaranteed Income Program.
  • Contractor tasks (summarized):
    • Determine administrative capacity, infrastructure, and cross-jurisdictional data‑sharing needed to run a statewide program.
    • Examine benefits and challenges of scaling up to reach larger shares of socially/economically vulnerable Californians, with emphasis on high cost-of-living regions and lessons from the existing California Guaranteed Income Pilot Program.
    • Explore progressive, equitable, and sustainable funding mechanisms and partnerships.
    • Recommend a data-driven approach to identify priority populations and payment design (duration, payment amounts, target groups).
    • Identify how a statewide guaranteed income could preserve eligibility for existing state and federal benefits and maintain federal contributions.
    • Identify necessary data-sharing partnerships among state agencies, local governments, HUD-assisted housing participants, nonprofits, and pilot program implementers.
    • Assess potential coordination of funding (without changing existing allocation formulas).
    • Present policy and procedural recommendations to enable legislative or governmental action to create a permanent program.
  • DSS may convene a steering committee of stakeholders (per bill) to assist the contractor (document references steering committee; detailed composition in truncated text).
  • Required state agencies must disclose necessary data to DSS — to the extent permitted by federal law — including:
    • Department of Health Care Services
    • Department of Public Health
    • Employment Development Department
    • Interagency Council on Homelessness
    • Franchise Tax Board
  • DSS must publish findings and report to the Governor and Legislature on or before January 1, 2028.
  • DSS is authorized to implement, interpret, or make specific the act without taking regulatory action, and to accept and, subject to appropriation, expend funds to administer the act.

Who is affected

  • State departments and agencies listed above (data-sharing responsibilities).
  • Local governments, county welfare agencies, nonprofit and community-based implementers participating in pilots or program delivery.
  • Low-income Californians — with attention to priority populations named in the bill: single heads of household; survivors of intimate partner violence; undocumented immigrants; seniors in poverty; CalWORKs recipients; formerly incarcerated individuals; transition-age foster youth; LGBTQ+ individuals.
  • The Legislature and Governor (will receive the feasibility report).

Timeline & procedural notes

  • DSS must publish the contractor’s report and deliver it to the Governor and Legislature by January 1, 2028.
  • The bill allows DSS to accept and expend funds for implementation subject to appropriation (authorization to seek/receive funding but requires appropriation).
  • Fiscal committee review required (digest shows Fiscal Committee: YES). The digest labels "Appropriation: NO" but the bill text repeatedly conditions contracting/administration on appropriations and authorizes expenditure subject to appropriation.

Legislative status & sponsors (selected)

  • Introduced February 14, 2025.
  • Referred to Assembly Human Services (March 3, 2025); passed out of that committee and re-referred to Assembly Appropriations (March 26, 2025); placed in Appropriations suspense file (April 9, 2025); held under submission in committee (May 23, 2025).
  • Coauthors and sponsors listed in your notes include Representatives Sinicki, Stubbs, Vining, Neubauer, Stroud, Emerson, Clancy, Roe, Taylor, Palmeri, Miresse, Moore Omokunde, Goodwin, DeSmidt, Madison, Brown; Senators L. Johnson, Habush Sinykin, Larson and Smith are listed as cosponsors in one entry. Representative Subeck added as a coauthor (Nov. 21, 2025).

Potential impacts / issues to watch

  • Fiscal impact: contracting and analysis costs, plus potential future program costs if recommendations lead to implementation; subject to appropriation and fiscal committee review.
  • Data privacy and federal law constraints: data sharing is authorized "to the extent permitted by federal law," so practical access to some data may be limited or require agreements.
  • Interactions with federal benefit rules: preserving eligibility and maintaining federal contributions is a central study objective; outcomes could affect program design significantly.
  • Distributional choices: the study will recommend targeting and payment design that affects who benefits and how much.

If you want, I can:
- Produce a version focused on fiscal implications,
- Extract the contractor task list as an itemized checklist, or
- Draft potential legislative amendments to address data privacy, funding, or timeline concerns.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.