WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 4712

Relating to an annual report by the comptroller of public accounts on the fiscal impact to this state of persons not lawfully present.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Ben Bumgarner and 11 co-sponsors

Requires Texas Comptroller to annually report fiscal costs and revenues from undocumented immigrants across state programs and budgets.

Referred to State Affairs
#aliens(i0032) #comptrollerofpublicaccounts(v2608) #criminaljustice #texasdepartmentof(v8788) #educationagency #texas(v9941) #health&humanservicescommission(v0177) #publicsafety #departmentof(v0251) #statefinances--management&control(i0748) #workforcecommission #texas(v0470)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 4712

Legislative bill overview

HB 4712 would require Texas's Comptroller of Public Accounts to produce an annual report analyzing the fiscal impact—both costs and revenues—associated with individuals not lawfully present in the state. The bill mandates comprehensive data collection across state agencies and programs to quantify spending and tax contributions related to this population.

Why is this important

This legislation directly addresses a high-profile policy debate by attempting to establish official state-level data on immigration's fiscal effects. Such a report could significantly influence future budget decisions, immigration policy discussions, and federal-state funding negotiations, while also providing empirical information to inform public discourse that is often driven by estimates rather than official state accounting.

Potential points of contention

  • Data collection burden and privacy concerns: Agencies would need to identify and track individuals by immigration status, raising questions about data accuracy, privacy protections, and implementation costs across multiple state systems
  • Methodology disputes: Determining what costs to include (emergency services, education, law enforcement, incarceration) versus revenue attribution (sales tax, property tax, indirect contributions) involves subjective policy choices that different stakeholders will contest
  • Political use of findings: The report's conclusions could be weaponized by either side of the immigration debate regardless of actual findings, and methodological limitations may be overlooked in political messaging

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.