WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

AB 221

Relating to: all-terrain vehicles and utility terrain vehicles with out-of-state registrations.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Barbara Dittrich and 5 co-sponsors

AB 221 lets physician-dentists use dental anesthesia without a separate DPBH permit; dental-board oversight remains, reducing regulatory duplication and costs for offices.

Published 12-10-2025
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · AB 221

AB 221 — Exemption from duplicate permitting for anesthesia/sedation in dental care settings (BDR 40‑672)

Status: Chapter 464 (2025). Introduced: Jan. 8, 2025. Enacted/approved by Governor: June 10–11, 2025.

Purpose / intent

AB 221 eliminates duplicative permitting requirements for certain health‑care offices that administer anesthesia or sedation to dental patients. It is intended to reduce regulatory and financial burdens on providers (notably dual‑licensed oral and maxillofacial surgeons) while preserving the requirement that anesthesia be provided only by clinicians authorized and permitted by the Board of Dental Examiners.

Key provisions

  • Amends NRS 449.441, 630.373 and 633.694 to create a limited exemption from permits issued by the Division of Public and Behavioral Health (DPBH).
  • An office of a physician (or a health‑care facility that is not a medical facility) is exempt from the DPBH permit requirement if all three of the following apply:
    1. The office/facility administers general anesthesia, deep sedation, or conscious sedation only to dental patients; and
    2. The physician administering the anesthesia is also licensed to practice dentistry (chapter 631 NRS); and
    3. That physician holds a permit issued by the Board of Dental Examiners authorizing administration of general anesthesia, minimal/moderate sedation, or deep sedation to dental patients, and the physician limits administration to the scope of that dental permit.
  • Physicians and osteopathic physicians may administer or directly supervise general anesthesia/conscious/deep sedation when performed in:
    • an office/facility that holds a DPBH permit or is exempt under NRS 449.441 (as amended),
    • a medical facility, or
    • outside Nevada.
  • The bill therefore removes the requirement that a clinician who is both a licensed physician and a licensed dentist maintain separate DPBH and dental‑board permits for the same dental anesthesia services.

Who is affected

  • Primary: dual‑licensed clinicians (physician + dentist), particularly oral and maxillofacial surgeons who provide dental procedures under general anesthesia in office settings.
  • Offices of physicians that provide anesthesia solely for dental patients (these may be exempt from DPBH permitting if conditions are met).
  • Regulatory agencies: Board of Dental Examiners retains permit authority for dental anesthesia; DPBH will have fewer offices required to hold separate permits.
  • Patients: no change in clinical scope of practice; the bill does not change clinical standards required by the dental permit.

Fiscal and procedural notes

  • Fiscal impact: bill notes “Effect on the State: Yes; Effect on Local Government: No.” (measure may reduce DPBH administrative workload; potential offsetting impacts not detailed).
  • Legislative timeline: introduced Jan. 2025; passed through relevant committees; enrolled and delivered to Governor in June 2025 and chaptered as statute (Chapter 464).

Support and comments

  • Testimony from practicing oral and maxillofacial surgeons and other clinicians described the current dual‑permit regime as costly and burdensome for solo and small practices (cited increased inspection/accreditation costs and duplication of oversight) and supported the exemption to avoid double regulation while maintaining dental‑board oversight.

Summary: AB 221 removes a duplicative state permitting requirement for offices where a physician who is also a licensed dentist provides anesthesia to dental patients, relying on the Board of Dental Examiners’ permit as the controlling authorization and thereby reducing regulatory duplication and related costs.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.