WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

AB 536

Relating to: accessibility training for election officials. (FE)

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Deb Andraca and 15 co-sponsors

Requires no-cost coverage for FDA-approved colorectal cancer screening tests that meet CMS/NCD or USPSTF/ACS guidelines in California.

Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · AB 536

I can summarize AB 536 — but the materials you supplied include multiple different bills all labeled “AB 536” from different states and on very different topics. To avoid producing the wrong summary, please confirm which bill you want summarized. Below I identify the distinct bills I found and give a very brief pointer for each so you can pick.

Summary of the different AB 536s in your documents
- California (author: Patterson) — Health care coverage: colorectal cancer screening
- Purpose: amends Health & Safety Code §1367.668 and Insurance Code §10123.207 to (1) make technical, nonsubstantive edits and (2) explicitly require cost‑free coverage for colorectal cancer screening tests that are FDA‑approved and either meet CMS National Coverage Determination requirements or are included in the American Cancer Society guidelines, in addition to tests graded A or B by the USPSTF.
- Status in provided documents: Passed Assembly; referred to Senate committees and Appropriations; multiple committee reports dated Apr–Jul 2025.

  • Nevada (Assembly Committee on Revenue / As Introduced) — Tobacco taxation and product classification (heated “heat‑not‑burn” products)

    • Purpose: revise Nevada cigarette/tobacco statutes to (1) treat tobacco intended to be heated but not burned as “cigarettes” for licensing/tax purposes, (2) create a reduced excise tax rate (0.90 per pack of 20, vs $1.80) for heated tobacco products that are FDA‑authorized as MRTPs and meet youth‑use thresholds, (3) prohibit sale of those heated cigarettes through vending machines, and (4) make related conforming changes. Extensive stakeholder letters both supporting and opposing are included.
    • Status in provided documents: Referred to Revenue Committee (Nevada) March 2025; hearings and stakeholder letters included.

  • Wisconsin (AB‑0536 / fiscal estimate included) — Accessibility training for election officials

    • Purpose (from the fiscal estimate header): relates to “accessibility training for election officials.” The single fiscal document you provided (DOA fiscal estimate) indicates no state fiscal effect or indeterminate/local impacts; details and full bill text were not provided in your packet.
    • Status in provided documents: Fiscal estimate received (Oct 2025 on the document), but no substantive bill text in your materials.

Which would you like me to summarize in full?
- Option A: Full summary of the California AB 536 (colorectal screening coverage) — I can produce a 200–400 word plain‑language summary with key provisions, affected parties, effective dates.
- Option B: Full summary of the Nevada AB 536 (heated tobacco taxation & classification) — I can produce a 200–400 word summary covering definitions, tax rates, conditions for reduced tax, vending machine prohibition, enforcement, and stakeholder positions.
- Option C: Full summary of the Wisconsin AB‑0536 (accessibility training for election officials) — I can summarize based on the fiscal note but I’ll need the bill text to provide a fully detailed summary; otherwise I’ll make a short caveated summary of available fiscal details.
- Option D: Short summaries of all three (one paragraph each).

Reply with A, B, C, or D (or tell me which jurisdiction/text you actually want), and I’ll produce the requested full summary.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.