WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 82

Relating to abortion, including civil liability for distribution of abortion-inducing drugs; making conforming changes and harmonizing conforming provisions; authorizing a private civil right of action.

89th Legislature, 2nd Called Session (2025) Introduced by Briscoe Cain and 2 co-sponsors

Texas bill HB 82 creates private civil liability for distributing abortion-inducing drugs, allowing individuals to sue providers and potentially others in the distribution chain.

Referred to State Affairs
#abortion(i0005) #computers&software(s2425) #civilremedies&liabilities(i0065) #courts--civilprocedure(i0135) #crimes--miscellaneous(i0200) #electronicinformationsystems(i0311) #mailorder(s0386) #medicine&prescriptiondrugs(s7338) #women&childprotectionact(p71x8)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 82

Legislative bill overview

HB 82 would create civil liability provisions related to the distribution of abortion-inducing drugs in Texas and establish a private right of action allowing individuals to sue over such distributions. The bill makes conforming changes to existing law, suggesting it builds on Texas's existing abortion restrictions. This represents an expansion of enforcement mechanisms beyond criminal penalties to private civil suits.

Why is this important

Texas has among the nation's strictest abortion laws. Adding civil liability for distributing abortion-inducing drugs would create financial risk for medical professionals, pharmacists, and potentially others in the supply chain. This could significantly chill the provision of medication abortion services (primarily mifepristone) even in circumstances where it might be legal, and creates enforcement through private parties rather than state prosecutors alone.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope of liability: Unclear whether civil liability extends only to providers or also to pharmacists, shipping companies, family members, or others in the distribution chain—creating potential for overly broad litigation
  • Conflict with federal law: Medication abortion is FDA-approved and federally protected; this state law could conflict with federal authority over drug distribution and interstate commerce
  • Access to legal medication: The bill could restrict access to drugs that remain legal under federal law in other states or for other medical purposes, raising constitutional questions about dormant Commerce Clause and due process

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.