WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 1065

Relating to a required provision in certain governmental entity contracts regarding the carrying of handguns by license holders; providing civil penalties.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Brandon Creighton and 3 co-sponsors

Texas bill mandates governmental entities permit handgun carrying in contracts; imposes civil penalties for violations, limiting local firearms restrictions.

Committee report sent to Calendars
#attorneygeneral(v2811) #contractors&subcontractors(s2563) #civilremedies&liabilities(i0065) #courts--general(i0160) #education--higher--general(i0231) #legislature(i0520) #politicalsubdivisions(i0588) #publiclands #buildings&resources(i0630) #purchasing--general(i0642) #stateagencies #boards&commissions(i0749) #weapons(i0887)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1065

Legislative bill overview

SB 1065 requires governmental entities in Texas to include provisions in their contracts that explicitly permit license holders to carry handguns, unless prohibited by federal law or specific statutory exceptions. The bill establishes civil penalties for governmental entities that violate this requirement by restricting handgun carry in contracts.

Why is this important

This legislation would significantly limit governmental entities' ability to restrict firearms on their property or in contracts they manage, affecting parks, transit systems, facilities, and vendor agreements. It represents a substantial shift in local control, as it restricts cities, counties, and other public entities from setting their own security policies based on their assessed needs.

Potential points of contention

  • Preemption of local authority: The bill removes discretionary power from cities and counties to establish firearm policies tailored to specific venues (schools, courthouses, mental health facilities, public events), which some argue compromises public safety and facility management
  • Scope and enforcement ambiguity: The definition of "certain governmental entity contracts" may create uncertainty about which agreements are covered, and civil penalties could expose municipalities to litigation costs
  • Constitutional and practical tensions: While aligned with Texas constitutional carry principles, it may conflict with federal facility restrictions and create liability questions regarding injuries caused by firearms on government property

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.