WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 1993

Relating to a prohibition on certain roadway projects and to the distribution of affordable housing funds to local governmental entities that violate that prohibition.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Bob Hall and 1 co-sponsor

Texas bill restricts certain roadway projects and penalizes non-compliant local governments by withholding affordable housing funds distribution.

Co-author authorized
#citygovernment--roads(i0066) #countygovernment--roads(i0099) #elections--general(i0310) #housing&communityaffairs #texasdepartmentof(v0008) #housing--finance(i0407) #publicnotice(s0264) #transportationcommission #texas(v0040) #transportation #texasdepartmentof(v8796)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1993

Legislative bill overview

SB 1993 would prohibit certain roadway projects in Texas and create financial penalties for local governments that violate this prohibition by withholding affordable housing funds. The bill ties infrastructure development restrictions to housing fund distribution, creating a dual enforcement mechanism for regulating transportation projects.

Why is this important

This bill directly affects how Texas cities and counties can develop road infrastructure and fund affordable housing simultaneously. It creates a potential trade-off where communities must choose between certain transportation projects and access to state affordable housing resources, which could significantly impact urban planning and housing policy in Texas municipalities.

Potential points of contention

  • Specificity of "certain roadway projects": The bill title doesn't specify which projects are prohibited, making it unclear what transportation infrastructure would be restricted and whether the definitions are overly broad or narrow
  • Affordable housing fund leverage: Using housing funds as a punishment mechanism may harm residents needing affordable housing in communities pursuing disfavored road projects, raising equity concerns
  • Local autonomy vs. state control: The bill may face opposition from municipalities arguing it improperly restricts local land-use and infrastructure decisions that serve regional needs

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.