WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 129

Relating to a prohibition on certain governmental contracts with foreign adversary companies and federally banned companies; authorizing a civil penalty.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Jeff Barry and 23 co-sponsors

Texas HB 129 bans state government contracts with foreign adversary and federally sanctioned companies, imposing civil penalties for violations.

Referred to State Affairs
#business&commerce--general(i0050) #competitivebidding(s0267) #civilremedies&liabilities(i0065) #internationalrelations(s0038) #intergovernmentalrelations(i0447) #politicalsubdivisions(i0588) #purchasing--state(i0643) #stateagencies #boards&commissions(i0749) #terrorism&internalsecurity(s0574)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 129

Legislative bill overview

HB 129 prohibits Texas government entities from entering into contracts with companies designated as foreign adversaries or those on federal ban lists. The bill establishes civil penalties for violations and creates enforcement mechanisms to ensure government spending does not support adversarial nations or federally sanctioned entities.

Why is this important

Government procurement represents billions in annual spending, and this bill directs those funds away from entities linked to foreign adversaries—potentially affecting supply chains, technology purchases, and infrastructure projects. It reflects growing bipartisan concern about national security risks in government contracting while raising practical questions about implementation and cost.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition and enforcement challenges: "Foreign adversary companies" lacks a single federal definition, creating ambiguity about which entities qualify and who determines this status
  • Cost and supply chain impacts: Restricting vendor pools may increase procurement costs for Texas agencies or limit access to cost-effective goods and services, potentially raising taxpayer expenses
  • Coordination with federal standards: The bill references federal ban lists that evolve; unclear synchronization mechanisms could create compliance confusion or outdated restrictions

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.