WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 2107

Relating to a pilot program for outcomes-based contracts at public schools.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Brandon Creighton

SB 2107 creates a Texas pilot program enabling public schools to use performance-based contracts where funding ties to measurable educational outcomes rather than traditional spending metrics.

Referred to Education K-16
#contractors&subcontractors(s2563) #educationagency #texas(v9941) #education--primary&secondary--accountability(i0007) #education--primary&secondary--charterschools(i0245) #education--primary&secondary--finance(i0250) #education--schooldistricts(i0220) #statefinances--management&control(i0748)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2107

Legislative bill overview

SB 2107 establishes a pilot program allowing Texas public schools to enter into outcomes-based contracts where compensation or funding is tied to measurable performance results rather than traditional input-based metrics. The bill creates a framework for schools to experiment with performance-based contracting arrangements, potentially with vendors, service providers, or within district operations.

Why is this important

Outcomes-based contracting represents a shift from traditional education funding models toward accountability and performance incentives. This could affect how schools allocate resources, structure vendor agreements, and measure success—potentially improving efficiency or creating pressure on schools to meet specific metrics. The pilot program approach allows limited testing before broader implementation.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition and measurement of "outcomes": Determining which metrics constitute success (test scores, graduation rates, student growth, etc.) and who sets those standards remains undefined in available bill information
  • Equity concerns: Performance-based systems may disadvantage schools serving economically disadvantaged or high-needs populations that face steeper achievement challenges
  • Implementation costs: Establishing new tracking, evaluation, and accountability systems requires resources; unclear how pilots will be funded
  • Vendor accountability: Risk that vendors prioritize profit over educational quality if contracts incentivize cost-cutting over student outcomes

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.