WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 474

Relates to vulnerable elderly persons

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Jim Tedisco

Directs EOHHS to pursue federal approval so frail-elder MassHealth members can choose assisted living instead of nursing home care, capped at 80% of institutional cost.

REFERRED TO CODES
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 474

Summary — S. 474 (2025): An Act relative to assisted living and the frail elder waiver

Status snapshot
- Introduced: February 6, 2025 (filed as Senate Docket No. 1319)
- Principal petitioners/authors in bill text: Senator Patricia D. Jehlen; co‑petitioners Thomas M. Stanley and Dylan A. Fernandes
- Committee activity: Referred to multiple committees (Elder Affairs/Aging & Independence; Health Care Financing; Ways & Means/Codes). Committee recommended “ought to pass” (11/17/2025) and referred to Senate Ways & Means.
- Note: There are inconsistent sponsor listings in the materials provided; the bill text identifies Jehlen and co‑petitioners above.

Purpose
- Directs the Executive Office of Health and Human Services (EOHHS) to pursue federal approvals so MassHealth members who qualify for the frail elder home-and-community–based services (HCBS) waiver may choose to receive assisted living as an alternative to institutional nursing home care.

Key provisions
1. Federal approval actions (deadline: within 90 days of the act’s effective date)
- EOHHS must submit applications (state plan amendments/options, waivers, or demonstrations) to establish an “assisted living” service enabling Medicaid‑eligible, nursing‑home‑at‑risk individuals to reside in certified assisted living residences.
- Rate limit: the average daily rate for the assisted living service, when combined with Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and the state supplementary payment, must not exceed 80% of the cost of substantially similar institutional care for the equivalent waiver year, as shown by the Factor G value in Appendix J of the MassHealth frail elder waiver (0059.R08.00).
- EOHHS/MassHealth must implement a rate schedule that uses disproportionate share (DSH) payment methodologies to promote equitable economic access between assisted living and institutional settings.

  1. Reporting to Ways & Means (deadline: within 120 days)

    • EOHHS must report on the status of submitted/pending federal applications and projected fiscal impacts.
    • Report must discuss options considered, including: amending the existing frail elder waiver (comparable to DC’s model), creating a new 1915(c) waiver for assisted living (comparable to Ohio), and enabling assisted living via managed‑care “in lieu of” authority (42 C.F.R. 435.3(e)(2), comparable to California).
  2. Barriers analysis by Executive Office of Aging & Independence (deadline: within 180 days)

    • Report to the Joint Committee on Elder Affairs identifying structural/organizational/cultural barriers that MassHealth members face in accessing assisted living — with emphasis on residents of qualified census tracts or difficult development areas and comparison to access to nursing facility services.

Who would be affected
- Primary: MassHealth members eligible for the frail elder waiver (Medicaid‑eligible older adults at risk of nursing home placement).
- Secondary: Certified assisted living providers, nursing facilities, counties/municipalities (development/availability considerations), MassHealth program budget and state Medicaid financing.
- Stakeholders: EOHHs, Executive Office of Aging & Independence, assisted living operators, consumer advocates, managed care plans.

Potential impact and considerations
- Could expand community‑based options and reduce nursing home admissions for frail elders, contingent on federal approvals and operational design.
- Fiscal effect depends on negotiated rates, federal match, and whether the assisted living benefit is cheaper than institutional care (bill caps combined payment at 80% of institutional cost benchmark).
- Equity/access concerns remain for low‑income neighborhoods and “difficult development areas”; the bill mandates study of those barriers.
- Implementation requires federal waivers/approvals and administrative rulemaking; timelines in the bill are reporting deadlines, not immediate benefit rollout.

Procedural next steps
- EOHHS and EOAI must complete the submissions and reports within the stated deadlines after the law’s effective date. Any actual program launch would follow federal approvals and MassHealth policy/rate setting.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.