Relates to the removal of actions to certain courts in an adjoining county

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Michelle Hinchey

Relates to moving civil actions to adjoining-county courts; now carried in A7563, altering venue-removal rules and affecting plaintiffs, defendants, and court procedures.

SUBSTITUTED BY A7563

Overview

Bill Number: S 8312

Title: Relates to the removal of actions to certain courts in an adjoining county

Sponsor: Michelle Hinchey (primary)

Introduced: June 2, 2025

Current status: Substituted by A7563 (S 8312 has been replaced by or incorporated into A7563). Related companion bill: A 7563.

Related action: On June 9, 2025, S 8312 was substituted by A7563 and moved through the third-reading calendar; the language moving forward is now expected to be governed by A7563 rather than S 8312.

Purpose and intent

Based on the title, the bill concerns the removal (venue changes) of civil actions to courts located in an adjoining county. In practical terms, this typically involves procedures governing when and how a case can be moved from one jurisdiction’s court to a neighboring county’s court.

The substitution by A7563 indicates that the substantive provisions intended for S 8312 are now carried in A7563, suggesting the legislature decided to consolidate or refile the proposal under the companion/alternate bill number.

Key provisions (note on current availability)

The text of S 8312 is not provided here, and the bill has been substituted by A7563. Therefore, the exact statutory changes, thresholds, and affected courts are not specified in this summary.

To understand the precise changes, one should review the text of A7563, which now contains the applicable language and provisions originally associated with S 8312.

Potential impact (high level)

Affected parties: Plaintiffs and defendants in civil actions that could be venue-removed to an adjoining county, as well as local trial courts, clerks, and attorneys involved in motion practice for venue changes.

Procedural effects: If A7563 includes venue-removal reforms, it could alter:

Which actions may be removed to adjoining-county courts
Any thresholds, notice requirements, or timelines for removal
Procedures and standards for determining proper venue upon removal

Cross-county coordination: Changes could affect docketing, case assignment, and coordination between neighboring counties’ court systems.

Procedural history and timeline

2025-06-02: Introduced and referred to Rules.

2025-06-09: Ordered to third reading (Cal. 1722) and subsequently substituted by A7563.

Status note: With substitution, the substantive provisions are now expected to be in A7563 rather than S 8312; passage or enactment would depend on the fate of A7563 in the legislative process.

Next steps for readers

To obtain the exact provisions and impacts, review the text of A7563 (the substituted bill).

Track the current status of A7563, including committee actions, floor votes, and any fiscal notes.

If evaluating policy implications, consider how venue-removal rules affect access to courts, case management efficiency, and potential jurisdictional advantages or burdens for parties.

Bill